» Articles » PMID: 34081715

Generation and Validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ Accelerometer Cut-points for Assessing Physical Activity Intensity in Older Adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE Validation Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Jun 3
PMID 34081715
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study of physical activity in older adults is becoming more and more relevant. For evaluation of physical activity recommendations, intensity-specific accelerometer cut-points are utilized. However, research on accelerometer cut-points for older adults is still scarce. The aim of the study was to generate placement-specific cut-points of ActiGraph GT3X+ activity counts and raw measures of acceleration to determine physical activity intensity in older adults. A further aim was to compare the validity of the generated cut-points for a range of different physical activities. The study was a single experimental trial using a convenience sample. Study participants were 20 adults aged 59 to 73 years. Accelerometers were worn at six different placements (one on each wrist, one on each ankle, and two at the hip) and breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry was used as the reference for energy. The experiment comprised of two parts; a) The first required participants to walk on a treadmill at incremental speeds (3.0-5.0 km·h-1), and b) Five different everyday activities (reading, cleaning, shopping, cycling, aerobics) were staged in the laboratory setting. Accelerometer cut-points (activity counts, raw data) were derived for each of the investigated placements by linear regression using the treadmill part. Performance of the cut-points was assessed by applying the cut-points to the everyday activities. We provide cut-points for six placements and two accelerometer metrics in the specific age group. However, the derived cut-points did not outperform published ones. More research and innovative approaches are needed for improving internal and external validity of research results across populations and age groups.

Citing Articles

Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity Intensity Cut-Points for Hip-, Wrist-, Thigh-, and Lower Back Worn Accelerometer in Very Old Adults.

Skjodt M, Brond J, Tully M, Tsai L, Koster A, Visser M Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025; 35(1):e70009.

PMID: 39753998 PMC: 11698702. DOI: 10.1111/sms.70009.


Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of the Daily Consumption of Ruminant Milk on Digestive Comfort and Nutrition in Older Women: The YUMMI Study.

Ong S, Miller J, McNabb W, Gearry R, Ware L, Mullaney J Nutrients. 2024; 16(23.

PMID: 39683608 PMC: 11644153. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234215.


Adult Sports Participation and Physical Activity: How About Curling?.

Kanters M, Hipp J, Bunds K, Casper J, Nelson R J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2024; 4(2):107-117.

PMID: 39372064 PMC: 11448910.


Multicentre investigation on the effect of decompressive surgery on Balance and physical ActiviTy Levels amongst patients with lumbar Spinal stenosis (B-ATLAS): protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Zielinski O, Hallager D, Jensen K, Carreon L, Andersen M, Diederichsen L BMJ Open. 2024; 14(9):e085667.

PMID: 39313282 PMC: 11418479. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085667.


Data Analytics in Physical Activity Studies With Accelerometers: Scoping Review.

Liang Y, Wang C, Hsiao C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e59497.

PMID: 39259962 PMC: 11425027. DOI: 10.2196/59497.


References
1.
Rowlands A, Mirkes E, Yates T, Clemes S, Davies M, Khunti K . Accelerometer-assessed Physical Activity in Epidemiology: Are Monitors Equivalent?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017; 50(2):257-265. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001435. View

2.
Hall K, Howe C, Rana S, Martin C, Morey M . METs and accelerometry of walking in older adults: standard versus measured energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 45(3):574-82. PMC: 5822436. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318276c73c. View

3.
Migueles J, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Rowlands A, Henriksson P, Shiroma E, Acosta F . Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18235. PMC: 6890686. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54267-y. View

4.
Rhudy M, Mahoney J . A comprehensive comparison of simple step counting techniques using wrist- and ankle-mounted accelerometer and gyroscope signals. J Med Eng Technol. 2018; 42(3):236-243. DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2018.1470692. View

5.
Migueles J, Aadland E, Andersen L, Brond J, Chastin S, Hansen B . GRANADA consensus on analytical approaches to assess associations with accelerometer-determined physical behaviours (physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep) in epidemiological studies. Br J Sports Med. 2021; 56(7):376-384. PMC: 8938657. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103604. View