» Articles » PMID: 33081732

Time Allocation to Active Domains, Physical Activity, and Health Indicators in Older Adults: Cross-sectional Results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Oct 21
PMID 33081732
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) is one of the key determinants of healthy ageing. Research showed that time allocation plays an important role in PA. Therefore, an understanding of the time use of older adults is crucial for developing PA programs. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of time allocation and objectively measured PA, and several health indicators in older adults.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study all 915 participants of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study were included. The participants were 65 to 75 years old and resided in a subdistrict of Bremen, Germany (50.9% female). The active domains were derived from the SLOTH model (leisure activities, occupation, active transport, home-based activities). PA was objectively measured with accelerometers over seven consecutive days. Binary logistic regressions were used to test the associations of total PA and time spent in the domains with several health indicators (self-rated health, overweight, obesity, activities of daily living (ADL)).

Results: Participants over the age of 70 years were significantly less physically active than those under 70 years and women were significantly more physically active than men. Regardless of age and sex, most time was spent on home-based activities (women: 118.5 ± 87.8 min/day; men: 80.2 ± 69.4 min/day). Both PA and time spent on leisure activities were associated with a lower risk of bad self-rated health (0.36; 95%-CL: 0.20, 0.65 for PA; 0.93; 95%-CL: 0.87, 0.99 for leisure activities) and less limitations in ADL. PA and active transport seemed to lower the risk of overweight (0.39; 95%-CL: 0.25, 0.62 for PA; 0.80; 95%-CL: 0.69, 0.93 for active transport) and obesity (0.36; 95%-CL: 0.21, 0.60 for PA; 0.77; 95%-CL: 0.64, 0.92 for active transport). Having an occupation was associated with a lower risk of bad self-rated health (0.60; 95%-CL: 0.40, 0.92).

Conclusions: The results of this study provide insights in the time allocation to active domains and total PA of older adults, as well as the associations with health indicators. These findings have important implications for the development of PA programs and guidelines. Future research should examine the associations further in longitudinal studies.

Citing Articles

Validation of activity trackers to estimate energy expenditure in older adults with cardiovascular risk factors.

Rieckmann A, Jordan B, Burczik F, Meixner J, Thiel C PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309481.

PMID: 39190715 PMC: 11349177. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309481.


Sex differences in physical functioning among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study.

Stalling I, Gruber M, Bammann K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1766.

PMID: 38956507 PMC: 11221023. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19218-x.


Exploring Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity among Older Adults Living in Low-Population Density Regions: Gender Differences and Associations with Activity Dimensions.

Rua-Alonso M, Bovolini A, Raquel Costa-Brito A, Vaz C, Marques E, Serra N Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(22).

PMID: 37998440 PMC: 10671471. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11222948.


The effect of body mass index on self-rated health in middle-aged and older adults: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.

Wang J, Cai Y, Ren X, Ma B, Chen O Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023; 35(12):2929-2939.

PMID: 37848805 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-023-02585-7.


Development and reliability testing of an audit toolbox for the assessment of the physical activity friendliness of urban and rural environments in Germany.

Muller C, Domokos B, Amersbach T, Hausmayer E, Rossmann C, Wallmann-Sperlich B Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1153088.

PMID: 37637797 PMC: 10449332. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1153088.


References
1.
Forberger S, Bammann K, Bauer J, Boll S, Bolte G, Brand T . How to Tackle Key Challenges in the Promotion of Physical Activity among Older Adults (65+): The AEQUIPA Network Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(4). PMC: 5409580. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14040379. View

2.
Saelens B, Sallis J, Black J, Chen D . Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9):1552-8. PMC: 1448009. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1552. View

3.
Holstila A, Manty M, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E, Lahti J . Changes in leisure-time physical activity and physical and mental health functioning: a follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 27(12):1785-1792. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12758. View

4.
Zhao L, Kolonel L . Efficiency loss from categorizing quantitative exposures into qualitative exposures in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 136(4):464-74. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116520. View

5.
Hallal P, Andersen L, Bull F, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U . Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):247-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1. View