» Articles » PMID: 34079052

Integrated Molecular Characterisation of Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma Identifies Opportunities for Stratification

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jun 3
PMID 34079052
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) is an under-investigated ovarian cancer type. Recent studies have described disease subtypes defined by genomics and hormone receptor expression patterns; here, we determine the relationship between these subtyping layers to define the molecular landscape of EnOC with high granularity and identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in high-risk cases. Whole exome sequencing data were integrated with progesterone and oestrogen receptor (PR and ER) expression-defined subtypes in 90 EnOC cases following robust pathological assessment, revealing dominant clinical and molecular features in the resulting integrated subtypes. We demonstrate significant correlation between subtyping approaches: PR-high (PR + /ER + , PR + /ER-) cases were predominantly CTNNB1-mutant (73.2% vs 18.4%, P < 0.001), while PR-low (PR-/ER + , PR-/ER-) cases displayed higher TP53 mutation frequency (38.8% vs 7.3%, P = 0.001), greater genomic complexity (P = 0.007) and more frequent copy number alterations (P = 0.001). PR-high EnOC patients experience favourable disease-specific survival independent of clinicopathological and genomic features (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.71). TP53 mutation further delineates the outcome of patients with PR-low tumours (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.14-5.75). A simple, routinely applicable, classification algorithm utilising immunohistochemistry for PR and p53 recapitulated these subtypes and their survival profiles. The genomic profile of high-risk EnOC subtypes suggests that inhibitors of the MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways, alongside PARP inhibitors, represent promising candidate agents for improving patient survival. Patients with PR-low TP53-mutant EnOC have the greatest unmet clinical need, while PR-high tumours-which are typically CTNNB1-mutant and TP53 wild-type-experience excellent survival and may represent candidates for trials investigating de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy to agents such as endocrine therapy.

Citing Articles

Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma landscape: pathological and molecular characterization.

de Nonneville A, Kalbacher E, Cannone F, Guille A, Adelaide J, Finetti P Mol Oncol. 2024; 18(10):2586-2600.

PMID: 38923749 PMC: 11459045. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13679.


The survival benefit associated with complete macroscopic resection in epithelial ovarian cancer is histotype specific.

Porter J, McFarlane I, Bartos C, Churchman M, May J, Herrington C JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024; 8(4).

PMID: 38902938 PMC: 11233146. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae049.


Ovarian carcinosarcoma is highly aggressive compared to other ovarian cancer histotypes.

McFarlane I, Porter J, Brownsell E, Ghaoui N, Connolly K, Herrington C Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1399979.

PMID: 38854725 PMC: 11157229. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399979.


Complexity of the Genetic Background of Oncogenesis in Ovarian Cancer-Genetic Instability and Clinical Implications.

Murawski M, Jagodzinski A, Bielawska-Pohl A, Klimczak A Cells. 2024; 13(4.

PMID: 38391958 PMC: 10886918. DOI: 10.3390/cells13040345.


Compartment-specific multiomic profiling identifies SRC and GNAS as candidate drivers of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ovarian carcinosarcoma.

Herrington C, Oswald A, Stillie L, Croy I, Churchman M, Hollis R Br J Cancer. 2023; 130(2):327-335.

PMID: 38097740 PMC: 10803731. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02508-3.


References
1.
Sieh W, Kobel M, Longacre T, Bowtell D, DeFazio A, Goodman M . Hormone-receptor expression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(9):853-62. PMC: 4006367. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70253-5. View

2.
Kim G, Kurnit K, Djordjevic B, Singh C, Munsell M, Wang W . Nuclear β-catenin localization and mutation of the CTNNB1 gene: a context-dependent association. Mod Pathol. 2018; 31(10):1553-1559. PMC: 6168348. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0080-0. View

3.
Cibulskis K, Lawrence M, Carter S, Sivachenko A, Jaffe D, Sougnez C . Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(3):213-9. PMC: 3833702. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2514. View

4.
Langdon S, Gourley C, Gabra H, Stanley B . Endocrine therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016; 17(2):109-117. DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1272414. View

5.
Irodi A, Rye T, Herbert K, Churchman M, Bartos C, Mackean M . Patterns of clinicopathological features and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: 35 years of prospectively collected data. BJOG. 2020; 127(11):1409-1420. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16264. View