» Articles » PMID: 34051760

Holding the Frontline: a Cross-sectional Survey of Emergency Department Staff Well-being and Psychological Distress in the Course of the COVID-19 Outbreak

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 May 30
PMID 34051760
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been associated with stress and challenges for healthcare professionals, especially for those working in the front-line of treating COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to: 1) assess changes in well-being and perceived stress symptoms of Dutch emergency department (ED) staff in the course of the first COVID-19 wave, and 2) assess and explore stressors experienced by ED staff since the COVID-19 outbreak.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study. An online questionnaire was administered during June-July 2020 to physicians, nurses and non-clinical staff of four EDs in the Netherlands. Well-being and stress symptoms (i.e., cognitive, emotional and physical) were scored for the periods pre, during and after the first COVID-19 wave using the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and a 10-point Likert scale. Stressors were assessed and explored by rating experiences with specific situations (i.e., frequency and intensity of distress) and in free-text narratives. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations (GEE). Narratives were analyzed thematically.

Results: In total, 192 questionnaires were returned (39% response). Compared to pre-COVID-19, the mean WHO-5 index score (range: 0-100) decreased significantly with 14.1 points (p < 0.001) during the peak of the first wave and 3.7 points (< 0.001) after the first wave. Mean self-perceived stress symptom levels almost doubled during the peak of the first wave (≤0.005). Half of the respondents reported experiencing more moral distress in the ED since the COVID-19 outbreak. High levels of distress were primarily found in situations where the staff was unable to provide or facilitate necessary emotional support to a patient or family. Analysis of 51 free-texts revealed witnessing suffering, high work pressure, fear of contamination, inability to provide comfort and support, rapidly changing protocols regarding COVID-19 care and personal protection, and shortage of protection equipment as important stressors.

Conclusions: The first COVID-19 wave took its toll on ED staff. Actions to limit drop-out and illness among staff resulting from psychological distress are vital to secure acute care for (non-)COVID-19 patients during future infection waves.

Citing Articles

Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review.

Lopez-Atanes M, Saenz-Herrero M, Zach N, Lakeberg M, Ugedo A, Fraile-Garcia E Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):207.

PMID: 39385280 PMC: 11465889. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02286-1.


Emergency department workforces' experiences and perceptions of well-being from an international perspective: a scoping review.

Swancott L, Armstrong N, Roland D, Walters H, Kirk K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e087485.

PMID: 38986554 PMC: 11288155. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087485.


Prevalence and associated factors of secondary traumatic stress in emergency nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu Z, Zhao B, Zhang Z, Wang X, Jiang Y, Zhang M Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024; 15(1):2321761.

PMID: 38426665 PMC: 10911249. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2321761.


Impacts for health and care workers of Covid-19 and other public health emergencies of international concern: living systematic review, meta-analysis and policy recommendations.

Fronteira I, Mathews V, Dos Santos R, Matsumoto K, Amde W, Pereira A Hum Resour Health. 2024; 22(1):10.

PMID: 38273317 PMC: 10809470. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-024-00892-2.


Experience of moral distress among doctors at emergency departments in Stockholm during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.

Brune C, Agerholm J, Burstrom B, Liljas A Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2300151.

PMID: 38258523 PMC: 10810614. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2300151.


References
1.
Li L, Ai H, Gao L, Zhou H, Liu X, Zhang Z . Moderating effects of coping on work stress and job performance for nurses in tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional survey in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):401. PMC: 5469137. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2348-3. View

2.
Topp C, Ostergaard S, Sondergaard S, Bech P . The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015; 84(3):167-76. DOI: 10.1159/000376585. View

3.
Wiebe E, Kaczorowski J, MacKay J . Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58(4):e225-8. PMC: 3325475. View

4.
Shanafelt T, Ripp J, Trockel M . Understanding and Addressing Sources of Anxiety Among Health Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. 2020; 323(21):2133-2134. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5893. View

5.
Wong T, Yau J, Chan C, Kwong R, Ho S, Lau C . The psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on healthcare workers in emergency departments and how they cope. Eur J Emerg Med. 2005; 12(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1097/00063110-200502000-00005. View