Holding the Frontline: a Cross-sectional Survey of Emergency Department Staff Well-being and Psychological Distress in the Course of the COVID-19 Outbreak
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been associated with stress and challenges for healthcare professionals, especially for those working in the front-line of treating COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to: 1) assess changes in well-being and perceived stress symptoms of Dutch emergency department (ED) staff in the course of the first COVID-19 wave, and 2) assess and explore stressors experienced by ED staff since the COVID-19 outbreak.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study. An online questionnaire was administered during June-July 2020 to physicians, nurses and non-clinical staff of four EDs in the Netherlands. Well-being and stress symptoms (i.e., cognitive, emotional and physical) were scored for the periods pre, during and after the first COVID-19 wave using the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and a 10-point Likert scale. Stressors were assessed and explored by rating experiences with specific situations (i.e., frequency and intensity of distress) and in free-text narratives. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations (GEE). Narratives were analyzed thematically.
Results: In total, 192 questionnaires were returned (39% response). Compared to pre-COVID-19, the mean WHO-5 index score (range: 0-100) decreased significantly with 14.1 points (p < 0.001) during the peak of the first wave and 3.7 points (< 0.001) after the first wave. Mean self-perceived stress symptom levels almost doubled during the peak of the first wave (≤0.005). Half of the respondents reported experiencing more moral distress in the ED since the COVID-19 outbreak. High levels of distress were primarily found in situations where the staff was unable to provide or facilitate necessary emotional support to a patient or family. Analysis of 51 free-texts revealed witnessing suffering, high work pressure, fear of contamination, inability to provide comfort and support, rapidly changing protocols regarding COVID-19 care and personal protection, and shortage of protection equipment as important stressors.
Conclusions: The first COVID-19 wave took its toll on ED staff. Actions to limit drop-out and illness among staff resulting from psychological distress are vital to secure acute care for (non-)COVID-19 patients during future infection waves.
Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review.
Lopez-Atanes M, Saenz-Herrero M, Zach N, Lakeberg M, Ugedo A, Fraile-Garcia E Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):207.
PMID: 39385280 PMC: 11465889. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02286-1.
Swancott L, Armstrong N, Roland D, Walters H, Kirk K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e087485.
PMID: 38986554 PMC: 11288155. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087485.
Xu Z, Zhao B, Zhang Z, Wang X, Jiang Y, Zhang M Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024; 15(1):2321761.
PMID: 38426665 PMC: 10911249. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2321761.
Fronteira I, Mathews V, Dos Santos R, Matsumoto K, Amde W, Pereira A Hum Resour Health. 2024; 22(1):10.
PMID: 38273317 PMC: 10809470. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-024-00892-2.
Brune C, Agerholm J, Burstrom B, Liljas A Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2300151.
PMID: 38258523 PMC: 10810614. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2300151.