» Articles » PMID: 34050640

A Quantitative Study of Race and Gender Representation Within London Medical School Leadership

Overview
Journal Int J Med Educ
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 May 29
PMID 34050640
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To explore potential disparities in representation of Racially Minoritised (RM) persons and women in leadership roles in London Medical Schools compared to their RM and female student populations.

Methods: General Medical Council's Medical School Annual Return 2017-18 data and official leadership team webpages were used to determine percentages of RM and female students and percentages of RM and women leaders in London medical schools. Student and leadership team percentages were then compared using chi-squared tests to assess statistically significant differences.

Results: The percentage of RM persons filling leadership roles in London medical schools combined was statistically significantly less than the percentage of RM persons that compose the combined student body (8.6% (N=81) versus 60.2% (N=8786, χ(1, N=8,867)=88.83, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the percentage of women filling leadership roles and the percentage of women in the combined student body (43.4% (N = 83) versus 52.5% (N=9026, χ(1, N=9,109) =2.85, p=0.0913).

Conclusions: Results mirror the underrepresentation of RM persons in leadership positions throughout the National Health Service (NHS) and in higher education but reflect the improved representation of women in leadership positions seen at the NHS board level. Greater effort is necessary to rectify RM representation within London medical school leadership teams. This is especially imperative given that racially similar role models for RM students are an important predictor in determining academic and future success.

Citing Articles

Capacity building in migration and health in higher education: lessons from five European countries.

Diaz E, Gimeno-Feliu L, Czapka E, Suurmond J, Razum O, Kumar B Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 41:100818.

PMID: 39119097 PMC: 11306207. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100818.


Quantitative Analysis of Challenges Encountered by UK Widening Participation Medical Students in Comparison With Their Non-Widening Participation Peers.

Ravulapalli K, Arroyave Caicedo N, Zahra D, Mirza M J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024; 11:23821205241249012.

PMID: 38808124 PMC: 11131392. DOI: 10.1177/23821205241249012.


Is the awarding gap at UK medical schools influenced by ethnicity and medical school attended? A retrospective cohort study.

Brown C, Goss C, Sam A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e075945.

PMID: 38086586 PMC: 10753756. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075945.


Gender and racialisation of pharmaceutical sector leaders in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Satgunanathan K, Workentin A, Woods H, Sabir A, Persaud N BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e076235.

PMID: 37963692 PMC: 10649613. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076235.

References
1.
Chisholm-Burns M, Spivey C, Hagemann T, Josephson M . Women in leadership and the bewildering glass ceiling. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017; 74(5):312-324. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp160930. View

2.
Bhala N, Curry G, Martineau A, Agyemang C, Bhopal R . Sharpening the global focus on ethnicity and race in the time of COVID-19. Lancet. 2020; 395(10238):1673-1676. PMC: 7211499. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31102-8. View

3.
Woolf K, Jayaweera H, Unwin E, Keshwani K, Valerio C, Potts H . Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(3):e025004. PMC: 6429837. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025004. View

4.
Rimmer A . Five facts about diversity on NHS boards. BMJ. 2016; 354:i4654. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4654. View

5.
Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L . Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002; 324(7343):952-7. PMC: 102330. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952. View