» Articles » PMID: 34042259

Optimizing the Effective Spot Size and the Dosimetric Leaf Gap of the AcurosXB Algorithm for VMAT Treatment Planning

Overview
Date 2021 May 27
PMID 34042259
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to provide and test a new methodology to adjust the AcurosXB beam model for VMAT treatment plans.

Method: The effective target spot size of the AcurosXB v15 algorithm was adjusted in order to minimize the difference between calculated and measured penumbras. The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was adjusted using the asynchronous oscillating sweeping gap tests defined in the literature and the MLC transmission was measured. The impact of the four parameters on the small field output factors was assessed using a design of experiment methodology. Patient quality controls were performed for the three beam models investigated including two energies and two MLC models.

Results: Effective target spot sizes differed from the manufacturer recommendations and strongly depended on the MLC model considered. DLG values ranged from 0.7 to 2.3 mm and were found to be larger than the ones based on the sweeping gap tests. All parameters were found to significantly influence the calculated output factors, especially for the 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm field size. Interactions were also identified for fields smaller than 2 cm × 2 cm, suggesting that adjusting the parameters on the small field output factors should be done with caution. All patient quality controls passed the universal action limit of 90%.

Conclusion: The methodology provided is simple to implement in clinical practice. It was validated for three beam models covering a large variety of treatment types and localizations.

Citing Articles

Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 recommendations: Gamma index tolerance and action limits in IMRT and VMAT quality assurance using SunCHECK.

Deng J, Liu S, Huang Y, Li X, Wu X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(6):e14277.

PMID: 38243604 PMC: 11163510. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14277.

References
1.
Smilowitz J, Das I, Feygelman V, Fraass B, Kry S, Marshall I . AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(5):14–34. PMC: 5690154. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768. View

2.
Wasbo E, Valen H . Dosimetric discrepancies caused by differing MLC parameters for dynamic IMRT. Phys Med Biol. 2008; 53(2):405-15. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/2/008. View

3.
Vieillevigne L, Khamphan C, Saez J, Hernandez V . On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20(7):68-77. PMC: 6612699. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12656. View

4.
Hernandez V, Antonio Vera-Sanchez J, Vieillevigne L, Khamphan C, Saez J . A new method for modelling the tongue-and-groove in treatment planning systems. Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63(24):245005. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf098. View

5.
Kim J, Han J, Hsia A, Li S, Xu Z, Ryu S . Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 5:31-36. PMC: 7807868. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.003. View