» Articles » PMID: 34035393

Self-rated Attractiveness Predicts Preferences for Sexually Dimorphic Facial Characteristics in a Culturally Diverse Sample

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 26
PMID 34035393
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals who are more attractive are thought to show a greater preference for facial sexual dimorphism, potentially because individuals who perceive themselves as more physically attractive believe they will be better able to attract and/or retain sexually dimorphic partners. Evidence for this link is mixed, however, and recent research suggests the association between self-rated attractiveness and preferences for facial sexual dimorphism may not generalise to non-Western cultures. Here, we assess whether self-rated attractiveness and self-rated health predict facial sexual dimorphism preferences in a large and culturally diverse sample of 6907 women and 2851 men from 41 countries. We also investigated whether ecological factors, such as country health/development and inequality, might moderate this association. Our analyses found that men and women who rated themselves as more physically attractive reported stronger preferences for exaggerated sex-typical characteristics in other-sex faces. This finding suggests that associations between self-rated attractiveness and preferences for sexually dimorphic facial characteristics generalise to a culturally diverse sample and exist independently of country-level factors. We also found that country health/development moderated the effect of men's self-rated attractiveness on femininity preferences, such that men from countries with high health/development showed a positive association between self-rated attractiveness and femininity preference, while men from countries with low health/development showed the opposite trend.

Citing Articles

Misperception of the facial appearance that the opposite-sex desires.

Perrett D, Holzleitner I, Lei X PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0310835.

PMID: 39541280 PMC: 11563419. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310835.


Mate assessment based on physical characteristics: a review and reflection.

Watkins C Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):113-130.

PMID: 39175167 PMC: 11718632. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13131.


No evidence that sociosexual orientation moderates effects of conception probability on women's preferences for male facial masculinity.

Lee A, Jones B, Zietsch B, Jern P, Connolly H, Marcinkowska U Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10245.

PMID: 37353614 PMC: 10290078. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37404-6.

References
1.
Law Smith M, Deady D, Moore F, Jones B, Cornwell R, Stirrat M . Maternal tendencies in women are associated with estrogen levels and facial femininity. Horm Behav. 2011; 61(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.09.005. View

2.
Zaidi A, White J, Mattern B, Liebowitz C, Puts D, Claes P . Facial masculinity does not appear to be a condition-dependent male ornament and does not reflect MHC heterozygosity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(5):1633-1638. PMC: 6358690. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1808659116. View

3.
Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View

4.
Thornhill , Gangestad . Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999; 3(12):452-460. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5. View

5.
Barr D . Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:328. PMC: 3672519. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328. View