» Articles » PMID: 28516361

Familiarity with Own Population's Appearance Influences Facial Preferences

Overview
Journal Hum Nat
Date 2017 May 19
PMID 28516361
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have found that individuals from rural areas in Malaysia and in El Salvador prefer heavier women than individuals from urban areas. Several explanations have been proposed to explain these differences in weight preferences but no study has explored familiarity as a possible explanation. We therefore sought to investigate participants' face preferences while also examining the facial characteristics of the actual participants. Our results showed that participants from rural areas preferred heavier-looking female faces than participants from urban areas. We also found that the female faces from the rural areas were rated as looking heavier than the female faces from the urban areas. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that familiarity may be contributing to the differences found in face preferences between rural and urban areas given that people from rural and urban areas are exposed to different faces.

Citing Articles

Mate assessment based on physical characteristics: a review and reflection.

Watkins C Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):113-130.

PMID: 39175167 PMC: 11718632. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13131.


Self-rated attractiveness predicts preferences for sexually dimorphic facial characteristics in a culturally diverse sample.

Marcinkowska U, Jones B, Lee A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10905.

PMID: 34035393 PMC: 8149859. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90473-3.


Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color.

Kocnar T, Saribay S, Kleisner K PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225549.

PMID: 31751432 PMC: 6872208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225549.


Fear of Violence among Colombian Women Is Associated with Reduced Preferences for High-BMI Men.

Borras-Guevara M, Batres C, Perrett D Hum Nat. 2019; 30(3):341-369.

PMID: 31368014 PMC: 6698270. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-019-09350-8.


Facial Adiposity, Attractiveness, and Health: A Review.

de Jager S, Coetzee N, Coetzee V Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2562.

PMID: 30622491 PMC: 6308207. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02562.

References
1.
Batres C, Re D, Perrett D . Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces. Perception. 2015; 44(11):1293-309. DOI: 10.1177/0301006615596898. View

2.
Katzmarzyk P, Davis C . Thinness and body shape of Playboy centerfolds from 1978 to 1998. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25(4):590-2. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801571. View

3.
Brooks R, Scott I, Maklakov A, Kasumovic M, Clark A, Penton-Voak I . National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1707):810-2. PMC: 3049041. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0964. View

4.
Coetzee V, Chen J, Perrett D, Stephen I . Deciphering faces: quantifiable visual cues to weight. Perception. 2010; 39(1):51-61. DOI: 10.1068/p6560. View

5.
Scott I, Clark A, Josephson S, Boyette A, Cuthill I, Fried R . Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(40):14388-93. PMC: 4210032. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1409643111. View