The Effect of Nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan Scaffolds on Rat Calvarial Defects for Bone Regeneration
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: This study aims at determining the biological effect of 75/25 w/w nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan (nHAp/CS) scaffolds on bone regeneration, in terms of fraction of bone regeneration (FBR), total number of osteocytes (Ost), and osteocyte cell density (CD), as well as its biodegradability.
Methods: Two critical-size defects (CSDs) were bilaterally trephined in the parietal bone of 36 adult Sprague-Dawley rats (18 males and 18 females); the left remained empty (group A), while the right CSD was filled with nHAp/CS scaffold (group B). Two female rats died postoperatively. Twelve, 11, and 11 rats were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-surgery, respectively. Subsequently, 34 specimens were resected containing both CSDs. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed to determine the FBR, calculated as [the sum of areas of newly formed bone in lateral and central regions of interest (ROIs)]/area of the original defect, as well as the Ost and the CD (Ost/mm) in each ROI of both groups (A and B). Moreover, biodegradability of the nHAp/CS scaffolds was estimated via the surface area of the biomaterial (BmA) in the 2nd, 4th, and 8th week post-surgery.
Results: The FBR of group B increased significantly from 2nd to 8th week compared to group A (P = 0.009). Both the mean CD and the mean Ost values of group B increased compared to group A (P = 0.004 and P < 0.05 respectively). Moreover, the mean value of BmA decreased from 2nd to 8th week (P = 0.001).
Conclusions: Based on histological and histomorphometric results, we support that 75/25 w/w nHAp/CS scaffolds provide an effective space for new bone formation.
Aung L, Renn T, Chin-Yi Lin J, Salamanca E, Wu Y, Pan Y Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:12615-12631.
PMID: 39619054 PMC: 11606340. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S494580.
Souto-Lopes M, Grenho L, Manrique Y, Dias M, Lopes J, Fernandes M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1355950.
PMID: 39139296 PMC: 11319155. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1355950.
Comparison of different hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue repair: and analyses.
Su X, Si X, Liu Y, Xiong N, Li S, Tang L Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2024; 27(9):1155-1161.
PMID: 39055877 PMC: 11266744. DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2024.78578.16995.
Yu L, Shen Y, Yang J, Feng X, Zhou C, Lin J J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):903.
PMID: 38017558 PMC: 10683164. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04398-w.
Chimedtseren I, Yamahara S, Akiyama Y, Ito M, Arai Y, Gantugs A Regen Ther. 2023; 24:515-527.
PMID: 37841660 PMC: 10570703. DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.09.013.