» Articles » PMID: 34022920

Defining and Characterizing Task-shifting Medical Devices

Overview
Journal Global Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 May 23
PMID 34022920
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Task shifting could help address limited human resources available for the delivery of quality health care services in low-resource settings. However, the role of medical devices in supporting task shifting is not fully understood. This study aimed to 1) define "task-shifting medical devices" and 2) identify product characteristics to guide the design and development of task-shifting medical devices. A three-part survey questionnaire comprising open-ended, rank-ordering, and multiple-choice questions was disseminated to healthcare professionals worldwide. The survey included questions to capture stakeholders' general understanding of and preferences for task shifting in medicine and public health, and questions to define task-shifting medical devices and identify desirable product characteristics of task-shifting medical devices.

Results: Task-shifting medical devices were defined by respondents as "devices that can be used by a less specialized health worker". Aside from safe and effective, both essential characteristics for medical devices, easy to use was the most cited product characteristic for a task-shifting medical device. Responses also emphasized the importance of task-shifting medical devices to enable local agency, such as peer-to-peer training and local maintenance. Several additional frequently mentioned attributes included low cost, contextually appropriate, maintainable, capable of using an alternative power source, easy to understand, easy to learn, reusable, and easy to manage throughout its use cycle.

Conclusion: This study defines and characterizes task-shifting medical devices based on healthcare professionals' responses. Ease of use was identified as the most important characteristic that defines a task-shifting medical device, alongside safe and effective, and was strongly associated with enabling peer-to-peer training and maintainability. The findings from this study can be used to inform technology product profiles for medical devices used by lower-level cadres of healthcare workers in low-resource settings.

Citing Articles

Avoid equipment graveyards: rigorous process to improve identification and procurement of effective, affordable, and usable newborn devices in low-resource hospital settings.

Asma E, Heenan M, Banda G, Kirby R, Mangwiro L, Acemyan C BMC Pediatr. 2023; 23(Suppl 2):569.

PMID: 37968578 PMC: 10652423. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04362-x.


"Not shifting, but sharing": stakeholders' perspectives on mental health task-shifting in Indonesia.

Efendi F, Aurizki G, Yusuf A, McKenna L BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1):165.

PMID: 35751061 PMC: 9229425. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00945-8.

References
1.
Chu K, Rosseel P, Gielis P, Ford N . Surgical task shifting in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(5):e1000078. PMC: 2677109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000078. View

2.
McConnell E . How and what staff nurses learn about the medical devices they use in direct patient care. Res Nurs Health. 1995; 18(2):165-72. DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770180209. View

3.
Lehmann U, Van Damme W, Barten F, Sanders D . Task shifting: the answer to the human resources crisis in Africa?. Hum Resour Health. 2009; 7:49. PMC: 2705665. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-49. View

4.
Dawson A, Buchan J, Duffield C, Homer C, Wijewardena K . Task shifting and sharing in maternal and reproductive health in low-income countries: a narrative synthesis of current evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2013; 29(3):396-408. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czt026. View

5.
Malkin R . Design of health care technologies for the developing world. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007; 9:567-87. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151913. View