» Articles » PMID: 23721110

Case Studies of Innovative Medical Device Companies from India: Barriers and Enablers to Development

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2013 Jun 1
PMID 23721110
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over 75% of the medical devices used in India are imported. Often, they are costly and maladapted to low-resource settings. We have prepared case studies of six firms in Bangalore that could contribute to solving this problem. They have developed (or are developing) innovative health care products and therefore are pioneers in the Indian health care sector, better known for its reverse engineering skills. We have sought to understand what enablers and barriers they encountered.

Methods: Information for the case studies was collected through semi-structured interviews. Initially, over 40 stakeholders of the diagnostics sector in India were interviewed to understand the sector. However the focus here is on the six featured companies. Further information was obtained from company material and other published resources.

Results: In all cases, product innovation has been enabled by close interaction with local medical practitioners, links to global science and technology and global regulatory requirements. The major challenges were the lack of guidance on product specifications from the national regulatory agency, paucity of institutionalized health care payers and lack of transparency and formalized Health Technology Assessment in coverage decision-making. The absence of national evidence-based guidelines and of compulsory continuous education for medical practitioners were key obstacles in accessing the poorly regulated and fragmented private market.

Conclusions: Innovative Indian companies would benefit from a strengthened capacity and interdisciplinary work culture of the national device regulatory body, institutionalized health care payers and medical councils and associations. Continuous medical education and national medical guidelines for medical practitioners would facilitate market access for innovative products.

Citing Articles

The advancement of artificial intelligence in biomedical research and health innovation: challenges and opportunities in emerging economies.

da Silva R Global Health. 2024; 20(1):44.

PMID: 38773458 PMC: 11107016. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-024-01049-5.


Preclinical validation of NeoWarm, a low-cost infant warmer and carrier device, to ameliorate induced hypothermia in newborn piglets as models for human neonates.

Bluhm N, Tomlin G, Hoilett O, Lehner E, Walters B, Pickering A Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1378008.

PMID: 38633325 PMC: 11021732. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1378008.


Defining and characterizing task-shifting medical devices.

Sarvestani A, Coulentianos M, Sienko K Global Health. 2021; 17(1):60.

PMID: 34022920 PMC: 8140413. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00684-6.


Building an innovation system of medical devices in China: Drivers, barriers, and strategies for sustainability.

Cheong S, Li J, Ung C, Tang D, Hu H SAGE Open Med. 2020; 8:2050312120938218.

PMID: 32733676 PMC: 7372622. DOI: 10.1177/2050312120938218.


The work, goals, challenges, achievements, and recommendations of orphan medicinal product organizations in India: an interview-based study.

Chakraborty Choudhury M, Saberwal G Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019; 14(1):241.

PMID: 31684990 PMC: 6829914. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1224-0.


References
1.
Chakma J, Masum H, Perampaladas K, Heys J, Singer P . Case study: India's billion dollar biotech. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(8):783. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0810-783. View

2.
Saberwal G . Seeding a skilled workforce. Nat Biotechnol. 2009; 27(8):773-5. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0809-773. View

3.
Bajaj R . It is time to wash the linen. Natl Med J India. 2007; 20(3):147-9. View

4.
Frew S, Kettler H, Singer P . The Indian and Chinese health biotechnology industries: potential champions of global health?. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008; 27(4):1029-41. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1029. View

5.
Jaroslawski S, Pai M . Why are inaccurate tuberculosis serological tests widely used in the Indian private healthcare sector? A root-cause analysis. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2013; 2(1):39-50. PMC: 7320362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jegh.2011.12.001. View