» Articles » PMID: 34019600

Data Management and Sharing: Practices and Perceptions of Psychology Researchers

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 May 21
PMID 34019600
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research data is increasingly viewed as an important scholarly output. While a growing body of studies have investigated researcher practices and perceptions related to data sharing, information about data-related practices throughout the research process (including data collection and analysis) remains largely anecdotal. Building on our previous study of data practices in neuroimaging research, we conducted a survey of data management practices in the field of psychology. Our survey included questions about the type(s) of data collected, the tools used for data analysis, practices related to data organization, maintaining documentation, backup procedures, and long-term archiving of research materials. Our results demonstrate the complexity of managing and sharing data in psychology. Data is collected in multifarious forms from human participants, analyzed using a range of software tools, and archived in formats that may become obsolete. As individuals, our participants demonstrated relatively good data management practices, however they also indicated that there was little standardization within their research group. Participants generally indicated that they were willing to change their current practices in light of new technologies, opportunities, or requirements.

Citing Articles

Opening the black box of article retractions: exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors.

Kovacs M, Varga M, Dianovics D, Poldrack R, Aczel B R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(12):240844.

PMID: 39698151 PMC: 11651896. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240844.


Data sharing and data governance in sub-Saharan Africa: Perspectives from researchers and scientists engaged in data-intensive research.

Kabanda S, Cengiz N, Rajaratnam K, Watson B, Brown Q, Esterhuizen T S Afr J Sci. 2024; 119(5-6).

PMID: 39483790 PMC: 11526389. DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2023/15129.


Editorial for Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

Ngiam W, Geng J, Shomstein S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(8):2565-2568.

PMID: 39482551 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02973-9.


Investigation of research quality and transparency in neurosurgery through the utilization of open science practices.

Alam Z, Desai K, Maddali A, Sivan V, Kumar R, OMalley G Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):750.

PMID: 39377867 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03008-5.


Addressing researcher fraud: retrospective, real-time, and preventive strategies-including legal points and data management that prevents fraud.

Kennedy J Front Res Metr Anal. 2024; 9:1397649.

PMID: 38993994 PMC: 11236558. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2024.1397649.


References
1.
Dunning D, Heath C, Suls J . Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015; 5(3):69-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x. View

2.
Sloman S . Opening editorial: the changing face of Cognition. Cognition. 2014; 135:1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.004. View

3.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

4.
Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant T, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D . SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020; 17(3):261-272. PMC: 7056644. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. View

5.
Hardwicke T, Ioannidis J . Populating the Data Ark: An attempt to retrieve, preserve, and liberate data from the most highly-cited psychology and psychiatry articles. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201856. PMC: 6072126. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201856. View