» Articles » PMID: 3401636

Opiates Distinguish Spinal Excitation from Inhibition Evoked by Noxious Heat Stimuli in the Rat: Relevance to Theories of Analgesia

Overview
Journal Br J Pharmacol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1988 May 1
PMID 3401636
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that a significant part of the action of opiates in reducing responses to noxious stimuli is a reduction in the release of neurotransmitter from primary afferent fibres. 2. The effects of locally and systemically administered opiates were examined on the excitatory and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory responses of spinal dorsal horn neurones to noxious heat stimulation in the anaesthetized rat: the inhibitions are thought to involve the same C-fibre afferents as the excitation. 3. Microionophoretically administered morphine reduced the excitatory response i a small proportion of the cells, reduced the background firing in a larger proportion but was ineffective on the inhibition. 4. Intravenously injected morphine (0.5-6 mg kg-1) or etorphine (0.1-2 micrograms kg-1) invariably attenuated the excitation of dorsal horn neurones by noxious stimuli but had no effect on the inhibition. 5. It was concluded that the data do not support the hypothesis that the production of analgesia is due mainly to a reduction in the release of transmitter from primary afferent fibres.

Citing Articles

Mustard oil excites but does not inhibit nociceptive dorsal horn neurones in the rat: a presumed effect on A-delta fibres.

Harris N, Ryall R Br J Pharmacol. 1988; 94(1):180-4.

PMID: 3401635 PMC: 1853944. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb11513.x.


Morphine and substance P release in the spinal cord.

Morton C, Hutchison W, Duggan A, Hendry I Exp Brain Res. 1990; 82(1):89-96.

PMID: 1701733 DOI: 10.1007/BF00230841.

References
1.
Clark S, Ryall R . The antinociceptive action of etorphine in the dorsal horn is due to a direct spinal action and not to activation of descending inhibition. Br J Pharmacol. 1983; 78(2):307-19. PMC: 2044707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb09396.x. View

2.
WALL P, Fitzgerald M . If substance P fails to fulfil the criteria as a neurotransmitter in somatosensory afferents, what might be its function?. Ciba Found Symp. 1982; (91):249-66. DOI: 10.1002/9780470720738.ch14. View

3.
Gebhart G, Sandkuhler J, Thalhammer J, Zimmermann M . Inhibition in spinal cord of nociceptive information by electrical stimulation and morphine microinjection at identical sites in midbrain of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1984; 51(1):75-89. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.1.75. View

4.
Kuraishi Y, Hirota N, Sato Y, Hino Y, Satoh M, Takagi H . Evidence that substance P and somatostatin transmit separate information related to pain in the spinal dorsal horn. Brain Res. 1985; 325(1-2):294-8. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90326-9. View

5.
Leah J, Cameron A, Kelly W, Snow P . Coexistence of peptide immunoreactivity in sensory neurons of the cat. Neuroscience. 1985; 16(3):683-90. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90201-5. View