» Articles » PMID: 34001582

Aerosolised Fluorescein Can Quantify FFP Mask Faceseal Leakage: a Cost-effective Adaptation to the Existing Point of Care Fit Test

Overview
Journal Clin Med (Lond)
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 May 18
PMID 34001582
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A qualitative fit test using bitter-tasting aerosols is the commonest way to determine filtering face-piece (FFP) mask leakage. This taste test is subjective and biased by placebo. We propose a cheap, quantitative modification of the taste test by measuring the amount of fluorescein stained filter paper behind the mask using image analysis.

Methods: A bitter-tasting fluorescein solution was aerosolised during mask fit tests, with filter paper placed on masks' inner surfaces. Participants reported whether they could taste bitterness to determine taste test 'pass' or 'fail' results. Filter paper photographs were digitally analysed to quantify total fluorescence (TF).

Results: Fifty-six healthcare professionals were fit tested; 32 (57%) 'passed' the taste test. TF between the taste test 'pass' and 'fail' groups was significantly different (p<0.001). A cut-off (TF = 5.0 × 10 units) was determined at precision (78%) and recall (84%), resulting in 5/56 participants (9%) reclassified from 'pass' to 'fail' by the fluorescein test. Seven out of 56 (12%) reclassified from 'fail' to 'pass'.

Conclusion: Fluorescein is detectable and sensitive at identifying FFP mask leaks. These low-cost adaptations can enhance exiting fit testing to determine 'pass' and 'fail' groups, protecting those who 'passed' the taste test but have high fluorescein leak, and reassuring those who 'failed' the taste test despite having little fluorescein leak.

Citing Articles

New wine in old skins.

Emmanuel A Clin Med (Lond). 2021; 21(3):161.

PMID: 34001563 PMC: 8140714. DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.ed.21.3.1.

References
1.
Littlewood R, Mollan S, Pepper I, Hickman S . The Utility of Fundus Fluorescein Angiography in Neuro-Ophthalmology. Neuroophthalmology. 2019; 43(4):217-234. PMC: 6736131. DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2019.1604764. View

2.
Chughtai A, Stelzer-Braid S, Rawlinson W, Pontivivo G, Wang Q, Pan Y . Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):491. PMC: 6547584. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4109-x. View

3.
Lepelletier D, Grandbastien B, Romano-Bertrand S, Aho S, Chidiac C, Gehanno J . What face mask for what use in the context of COVID-19 pandemic? The French guidelines. J Hosp Infect. 2020; . PMC: 7194956. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.036. View

4.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T . Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):676-82. PMC: 3855844. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. View

5.
Noppen M, Dekeukeleire T, Hanon S, Stratakos G, Amjadi K, Madsen P . Fluorescein-enhanced autofluorescence thoracoscopy in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax and normal subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 174(1):26-30. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200602-259OC. View