» Articles » PMID: 34001061

Nomogram for Predicting Preoperative Regional Lymph Nodes Metastasis in Patients with Metaplastic Breast Cancer: a SEER Population-based Study

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 May 18
PMID 34001061
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer, and generally associated with poor outcomes. Lymph nodes metastasis (LNM) is confirmed as a critical independent prognostic factor and determine the optimal treatment strategies in MBC patients. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the possibility of preoperative regional LNM in MBC patients.

Methods: MBC patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included and stochastically divided into a training set and validation set at a ratio of 7:3. The risk variables of regional LNM in the training set were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. And then we integrated those risk factors to construct the nomogram. The prediction nomogram was further verified in the verification set. The discrimination, calibration and clinical utility of the nomogram were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively.

Results: A total of 2205 female MBC patients were included in the study. Among the 2205 patients, 24.8% (546/2205) had positive regional lymph nodes. The nomogram for predicting the risk of regional LNM contained predictors of grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status and tumor size, with AUC of 0.683 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.653-0.713) and 0.667 (95% CI: 0.621-0.712) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration plots showed perfect agreement between actual and predicted regional LNM risks. At the same time, DCA of the nomogram demonstrated good clinical utilities.

Conclusions: The nomogram established in this study showed excellent prediction ability, and could be used to preoperatively estimate the regional LNM risk in MBC.

Citing Articles

Predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a study based on the SEER database.

Li Q, Xu H, Bao B, Xie Y, Guo S, Gao Z Clin Exp Med. 2025; 25(1):82.

PMID: 40080204 PMC: 11906503. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-025-01591-5.


A novel nomogram predicting cancer-specific survival in small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis.

Rong Y, Zhu Y, Wu Y Transl Cancer Res. 2023; 11(12):4289-4302.

PMID: 36644187 PMC: 9834596. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-1561.


Establishment and validation of the survival prediction risk model for appendiceal cancer.

Liu T, Mi J, Wang Y, Qiao W, Wang C, Ma Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:1022595.

PMID: 36388937 PMC: 9650208. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1022595.


Establishment of prognostic model for postoperative patients with metaplastic breast cancer: Based on a retrospective large data analysis and Chinese multicenter study.

Wang G, Sun X, Ren X, Wang M, Wang Y, Zhang S Front Genet. 2022; 13:993116.

PMID: 36092916 PMC: 9454815. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.993116.


Low RUFY3 expression level is associated with lymph node metastasis in older women with invasive breast cancer.

Angarita F, Oshi M, Yamada A, Yan L, Matsuyama R, Edge S Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 192(1):19-32.

PMID: 35018543 PMC: 8844209. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06482-3.


References
1.
Giuliano A, Ballman K, McCall L, Beitsch P, Brennan M, Kelemen P . Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017; 318(10):918-926. PMC: 5672806. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470. View

2.
Cho N, Han W, Han B, Bae M, Ko E, Nam S . Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(11):1495-1502. PMC: 5710190. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1256. View

3.
Beatty J, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M . Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006; 191(5):657-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.038. View

4.
DeSantis C, Ma J, Gaudet M, Newman L, Miller K, Sauer A . Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(6):438-451. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21583. View

5.
Weigelt B, Kreike B, Reis-Filho J . Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like breast cancers: a genomic profiling analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 117(2):273-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0197-9. View