» Articles » PMID: 29330212

Early and Locally Advanced Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Presentation and Survival by Receptor Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2010-2014

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jan 14
PMID 29330212
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease subtype characterized by an aggressive clinical course. MBC is commonly triple negative (TN), although hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive cases do occur. Previous studies have reported similar outcomes for MBC with regard to HR status. Less is known about outcomes for HER2 positive MBC.

Materials And Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data were used to identify women diagnosed 2010-2014 with MBC or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Kaplan-Meier curves estimated overall survival (OS) and multivariate Cox models were fitted. For survival analyses, only first cancers were included, and 2014 diagnoses were excluded to allow for sufficient follow-up.

Results: Our MBC sample included 1,516 women. Relative to women with IDC, women with MBC were more likely to be older (63 vs. 61 years), black (16.0% vs. 11.1%), and present with stage III disease (15.6% vs. 10.8%). HER2 positive and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC tumors represented 5.2% and 23.0% of cases. For MBC overall, 3-year OS was greatest for women with HER2 positive MBC (91.8%), relative to women with TN (75.4%) and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC (77.1%). This difference was more pronounced for stage III MBC, for which 3-year OS was 92.9%, 47.1%, and 42.2% for women with HER2 positive, TN, and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC, respectively. A multivariate Cox model of MBC demonstrated that HER2 positive tumors (relative to TN) were associated with improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.79). In a second Cox model of exclusively HER2 positive tumors, OS did not differ between MBC and IDC disease subtypes (hazard ratio = 1.16, 95% CI 0.48-2.81).

Conclusion: In this contemporary, population-based study of women with MBC, HER2 but not HR status was associated with improved survival. Survival was similar between HER2 positive MBC and HER2 positive IDC. This suggests HER2 positive MBC is responsive to HER2-directed therapy, a finding that may offer insights for additional therapeutic approaches to MBC.

Implications For Practice: This population-based study reports recent outcomes, by receptor status, for women with metaplastic breast cancer. Survival in metaplastic breast cancer is not impacted by hormone receptor status. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report indicating that women with human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive metaplastic breast cancer have survival superior to women with HER2 negative metaplastic breast cancer and survival similar to women with HER2 positive invasive ductal carcinoma. This information can be used for counseling patients diagnosed with metaplastic breast cancer. Further understanding of HER2 positive metaplastic breast cancer could offer insights for the development of therapeutic approaches to metaplastic breast cancer more broadly.

Citing Articles

Pathogenic Germline Variants in Patients With Metaplastic Breast Cancer.

Demarest K, Anantharajah A, Maxwell K, Rohanizadegan M, Bradbury A, Nathanson K JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2460312.

PMID: 39964682 PMC: 11836754. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60312.


Research progress of paclitaxel nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Qiao J, Guo D, Tian H, Wang Z, Fan Q, Tian Y Mater Today Bio. 2024; 29:101358.

PMID: 39677523 PMC: 11638641. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101358.


Survival trends of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma with different hormone receptor statuses: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study.

Miao Z, Ba F, Wen Z, Chen K, Shen X, Gen F BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):628.

PMID: 39593066 PMC: 11590209. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03470-9.


The "Forgotten" Subtypes of Breast Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Selected Histological Variants Not Included or Not Recognized as Distinct Entities in the Current World Health Organization Classification of Breast Tumors.

Koufopoulos N, Boutas I, Pouliakis A, Samaras M, Kotanidis C, Kontogeorgi A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39125951 PMC: 11313581. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158382.


ROR2 promotes invasion and chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancer cells by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling.

Da X, Ge H, Shi J, Zhu C, Wang G, Fang Y Oncol Res. 2024; 32(7):1209-1219.

PMID: 38948021 PMC: 11209745. DOI: 10.32604/or.2024.045433.


References
1.
Rosenberg J, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, van der Heijden M, Balar A, Necchi A . Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10031):1909-20. PMC: 5480242. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4. View

2.
Boyle S, Kochetkova M . Breast cancer stem cells and the immune system: promotion, evasion and therapy. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2014; 19(2):203-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10911-014-9323-y. View

3.
Joneja U, Vranic S, Swensen J, Feldman R, Chen W, Kimbrough J . Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1. J Clin Pathol. 2016; 70(3):255-259. PMC: 5339564. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203874. View

4.
Kim H, Kim S, Jung W, Koo J . Metaplastic carcinoma show different expression pattern of YAP compared to triple-negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014; 36(2):1207-12. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2735-x. View

5.
Rizvi N, Hellmann M, Snyder A, Kvistborg P, Makarov V, Havel J . Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015; 348(6230):124-8. PMC: 4993154. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1348. View