» Articles » PMID: 33997497

Bone Physiological Microenvironment and Healing Mechanism: Basis for Future Bone-tissue Engineering Scaffolds

Overview
Journal Bioact Mater
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33997497
Citations 139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone-tissue defects affect millions of people worldwide. Despite being common treatment approaches, autologous and allogeneic bone grafting have not achieved the ideal therapeutic effect. This has prompted researchers to explore novel bone-regeneration methods. In recent decades, the development of bone tissue engineering (BTE) scaffolds has been leading the forefront of this field. As researchers have provided deep insights into bone physiology and the bone-healing mechanism, various biomimicking and bioinspired BTE scaffolds have been reported. Now it is necessary to review the progress of natural bone physiology and bone healing mechanism, which will provide more valuable enlightenments for researchers in this field. This work details the physiological microenvironment of the natural bone tissue, bone-healing process, and various biomolecules involved therein. Next, according to the bone physiological microenvironment and the delivery of bioactive factors based on the bone-healing mechanism, it elaborates the biomimetic design of a scaffold, highlighting the designing of BTE scaffolds according to bone biology and providing the rationale for designing next-generation BTE scaffolds that conform to natural bone healing and regeneration.

Citing Articles

"Disguise strategy" to bacteria: A multifunctional hydrogel with bacteria-targeting and photothermal conversion properties for the repair of infectious bone defects.

Li K, Xie E, Liu C, Hu J, Chen Q, Li J Bioact Mater. 2025; 47:343-360.

PMID: 40026823 PMC: 11870027. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.02.002.


Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Disuse After Hip Replacement.

Wang Q, Qu C, Li X, Yan Y Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002885 PMC: 11852602. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020471.


Parameter optimization of femtosecond laser pulses for implant cavity preparation.

Chen W, Yuan F, Liang S, Qu C, Lin S, Li X Biomed Opt Express. 2025; 16(2):460-472.

PMID: 39958864 PMC: 11828434. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.546367.


Current status of nano-embedded growth factors and stem cells delivery to bone for targeted repair and regeneration.

Liang W, Zhou C, Liu X, Xie Q, Xia L, Liu L J Orthop Translat. 2025; 50:257-273.

PMID: 39902262 PMC: 11788687. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.12.006.


Dual release scaffolds as a promising strategy for enhancing bone regeneration: an updated review.

Zhang Y, Zhou C, Xie Q, Xia L, Liu L, Bao W Nanomedicine (Lond). 2025; 20(4):371-388.

PMID: 39891431 PMC: 11812394. DOI: 10.1080/17435889.2025.2457317.


References
1.
Samorezov J, Alsberg E . Spatial regulation of controlled bioactive factor delivery for bone tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014; 84:45-67. PMC: 4428953. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.018. View

2.
Wang S, Hu F, Li J, Zhang S, Shen M, Huang M . Design of electrospun nanofibrous mats for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Nanomedicine. 2017; 14(7):2505-2520. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.12.024. View

3.
Ehnert S, Baur J, Schmitt A, Neumaier M, Lucke M, Dooley S . TGF-β1 as possible link between loss of bone mineral density and chronic inflammation. PLoS One. 2010; 5(11):e14073. PMC: 2989906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014073. View

4.
Chen X, Yan J, He F, Zhong D, Yang H, Pei M . Mechanical stretch induces antioxidant responses and osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells through activation of the AMPK-SIRT1 signaling pathway. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018; 126:187-201. PMC: 6165675. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.08.001. View

5.
Clarke B . Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3 Suppl 3:S131-9. PMC: 3152283. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04151206. View