» Articles » PMID: 33988097

Near-Occlusion is a Common Variant of Carotid Stenosis: Study and Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 May 14
PMID 33988097
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion is often described as rare. Recent studies have shown that near-occlusions are overlooked, especially near-occlusion without full collapse (with a small but normal-appearing distal internal carotid artery).

Objective: To assess the prevalence of near-occlusion among symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis, incidence of symptomatic near-occlusion, and review the literature.

Methods: Prospective controlled single-center cross-sectional study. Consecutive cases with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis were examined with computed tomography angiography (CTA). The CTAs were assessed for near-occlusion by two observers. A systematic literature review was performed with emphasis on how study design affects prevalence estimate.

Results: Totally, 186 patients with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis were included, 34% (n = 63, 95% CI 27, 41) had near-occlusion. The incidence of symptomatic near-occlusion was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5, 4.2) per 100,000 person-years. Inter-rater κ was 0.71. The average prevalence of near-occlusion among symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis was higher in studies with good design (30%, range 27%-34%) than studies without good design (9%, range 2%-10%).

Conclusions: Near-occlusion is common variant of symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis, both in the current study and in all previous studies of good design. Studies that suggest that near-occlusion is rare have had methodological issues.

Citing Articles

The pitfalls and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with carotid near-occlusion: a narrative review.

Xia F, Zhao J, Bao L, Lyu X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):9600-9619.

PMID: 39698665 PMC: 11651966. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1037.


Prevalence and clinical implications of calcification in internal carotid artery stenosis: a retrospective study.

Fu F, Liu X, Zhang R, Zhang S, Mao J, Li Y BMC Neurol. 2024; 24(1):279.

PMID: 39127616 PMC: 11316406. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03788-9.


Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial and extracranial blood flow in carotid near-occlusion.

Holmgren M, Henze A, Wahlin A, Eklund A, Fox A, Johansson E Neuroradiology. 2024; 66(4):589-599.

PMID: 38400954 PMC: 10937755. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03309-y.


Quantifying Carotid Stenosis: History, Current Applications, Limitations, and Potential: How Imaging Is Changing the Scenario.

Saba L, Scicolone R, Johansson E, Nardi V, Lanzino G, Kakkos S Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38255688 PMC: 10821425. DOI: 10.3390/life14010073.


Diagnostic separation of conventional ⩾50% carotid stenosis and near-occlusion with phase-contrast MRI.

Holmgren M, Henze A, Wahlin A, Eklund A, Fox A, Johansson E Eur Stroke J. 2023; 9(1):135-143.

PMID: 38032058 PMC: 10916822. DOI: 10.1177/23969873231215634.