» Articles » PMID: 33980896

Individual Differences in Sensory and Expectation Driven Interoceptive Processes: a Novel Paradigm with Implications for Alexithymia, Disordered Eating and Obesity

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 13
PMID 33980896
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Those with disordered eating and/or obesity often express difficulties in sensing or interpreting what is happening in the body (interoception). However, research is hindered by conceptual confusion, concerns surrounding domain specificity, and an inability to distinguish sensory (bottom-up) and expectation driven (top-down) interoceptive processes. A paradigm was therefore developed from an active inference perspective. Novel indices were computed and examined in those with alexithymia: a personality associated with interoceptive deficits and disordered eating. The paradigm successfully identified individuals driven by sensations rather than expectations: alexithymia was characterized by attenuated prior precision (a larger divergence between pre-prandial and post-prandial satiety, and low expectation confidence), and increased prediction error (a higher correlation between changes in hunger and blood glucose, and greater rebound hunger after a sensory incongruent drink). In addition, those with a higher BMI were less confident and had a larger anticipated satiety divergence. These findings demonstrate the need to move beyond existing paradigms such as the Satiety Quotient and Heartbeat Counting Task which may have limited our understanding of eating behaviour.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneous appetite patterns in depression: computational modeling of nutritional interoception, reward processing, and decision-making.

Uchida Y, Hikida T, Honda M, Yamashita Y Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1502508.

PMID: 39736895 PMC: 11683075. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1502508.


Investigating the modulation of gastric sensations and disposition toward food with taVNS.

Salaris A, Azevedo R Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(2):e14735.

PMID: 39614658 PMC: 11870815. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14735.


Interoceptive differences in elite sprint and long-distance runners: A multidimensional investigation.

Seabury T, Benton D, Young H PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0278067.

PMID: 36696380 PMC: 9876362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278067.

References
1.
Brunstrom J, Shakeshaft N, Scott-Samuel N . Measuring 'expected satiety' in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite. 2008; 51(3):604-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.017. View

2.
Forde C, Almiron-Roig E, Brunstrom J . Expected Satiety: Application to Weight Management and Understanding Energy Selection in Humans. Curr Obes Rep. 2015; 4(1):131-40. PMC: 4881812. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-015-0144-0. View

3.
Barron H, Auksztulewicz R, Friston K . Prediction and memory: A predictive coding account. Prog Neurobiol. 2020; 192:101821. PMC: 7305946. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101821. View

4.
Shah P, Hall R, Catmur C, Bird G . Alexithymia, not autism, is associated with impaired interoception. Cortex. 2016; 81:215-20. PMC: 4962768. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.021. View

5.
Barrett L, Simmons W . Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015; 16(7):419-29. PMC: 4731102. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3950. View