» Articles » PMID: 32130881

Short-Term Consumption of Sucralose With, but Not Without, Carbohydrate Impairs Neural and Metabolic Sensitivity to Sugar in Humans

Overview
Journal Cell Metab
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2020 Mar 5
PMID 32130881
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a general consensus that overconsumption of sugar-sweetened beverages contributes to the prevalence of obesity and related comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether a similar relationship exists for no- or low-calorie "diet" drinks is a subject of intensive debate and controversy. Here, we demonstrate that consuming seven sucralose-sweetened beverages with, but not without, a carbohydrate over 10 days decreases insulin sensitivity in healthy human participants, an effect that correlates with reductions in midbrain, insular, and cingulate responses to sweet, but not sour, salty, or savory, taste as assessed with fMRI. Taste perception was unaltered and consuming the carbohydrate alone had no effect. These findings indicate that consumption of sucralose in the presence of a carbohydrate rapidly impairs glucose metabolism and results in longer-term decreases in brain, but not perceptual sensitivity to sweet taste, suggesting dysregulation of gut-brain control of glucose metabolism.

Citing Articles

Dietary Guidance, Sensory, Health and Safety Considerations When Choosing Low and No-Calorie Sweeteners.

Sievenpiper J, Purkayastha S, Grotz V, Mora M, Zhou J, Hennings K Nutrients. 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40077663 PMC: 11902030. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050793.


Chemosensory and cardiometabolic improvements after a fasting-mimicking diet: A randomized cross-over clinical trial.

Micarelli A, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vezzoli A, Malacrida S, Caputo S, Micarelli B Cell Rep Med. 2025; 6(2):101971.

PMID: 39970875 PMC: 11866515. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101971.


Neural and metabolic factors in carbohydrate reward: Rationale, design, and methods for a flavor-nutrient learning paradigm in humans.

Kelly A, Baugh M, Ahrens M, Valle A, Sullivan R, Oster M Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 147:107717.

PMID: 39413990 PMC: 11688656. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107717.


Shared subcortical arousal systems across sensory modalities during transient modulation of attention.

Khalaf A, Lopez E, Li J, Horn A, Edlow B, Blumenfeld H bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345640 PMC: 11429725. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613316.


Could Insulin Be a Better Regulator of Appetite/Satiety Balance and Body Weight Maintenance in Response to Glucose Exposure Compared to Sucrose Substitutes? Unraveling Current Knowledge and Searching for More Appropriate Choices.

Antasouras G, Dakanalis A, Chrysafi M, Papadopoulou S, Trifonidi I, Spanoudaki M Med Sci (Basel). 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38921683 PMC: 11205552. DOI: 10.3390/medsci12020029.


References
1.
Mumford J, Nichols T . Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation. Neuroimage. 2007; 39(1):261-8. PMC: 2423281. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.061. View

2.
Pepino M . Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners. Physiol Behav. 2015; 152(Pt B):450-5. PMC: 4661066. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.024. View

3.
Ma J, Chang J, Checklin H, Young R, Jones K, Horowitz M . Effect of the artificial sweetener, sucralose, on small intestinal glucose absorption in healthy human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2010; 104(6):803-6. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510001327. View

4.
Chan C, Hashemi Z, Subhan F . The impact of low and no-caloric sweeteners on glucose absorption, incretin secretion, and glucose tolerance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017; 42(8):793-801. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0705. View

5.
Fowler S . Low-calorie sweetener use and energy balance: Results from experimental studies in animals, and large-scale prospective studies in humans. Physiol Behav. 2016; 164(Pt B):517-523. PMC: 5045440. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.047. View