» Articles » PMID: 33960718

On the Processing of Optimal Performances: Studying Arousal Evoked by Being Correct and Fast

Overview
Journal Brain Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 May 7
PMID 33960718
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Responses are optimal when they are accurate and fast. The present experiment investigated whether optimal responses evoke physiological arousal and whether performance affects the processing and evaluation of subsequent emotional material.

Methods: Participants performed a response-choice task, where feedback was a colored square reflecting performance quality or a face whose expression (happy or angry) did not indicate any aspect of performance. In the occurrence of an emotional stimulus, participants had to express a judgment about the emotional strength. The experiment focused on differences in the electrodermal and brain electrophysiological activities evoked by optimal (correct-fast) and suboptimal (correct-slow) responses, along with modulations on the processing and interpretation of facial emotions.

Results: The results showed that, compared to correct responses, incorrect responses elicited an augmented phasic skin conductance response (SCR) and enhanced response-locked event-related potentials. Importantly, among correct responses, the SCR and the correct-related negativity (CRN) were larger for correct-fast than correct-slow responses. Performance also affected the processing of faces, irrespective of the emotion, but it did not change the subjective interpretation. The EPN evoked by angry and happy faces was less negative after optimal than suboptimal responses.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the monitoring system is sensitive to detect correct-fast responses, resulting in a state of physiological arousal that might guide the reinforcement of optimal performances.

Citing Articles

The role of arousal and motivation in emotional conflict resolution: Implications for spinal cord injury.

Pecchinenda A, Gonzalez Pizzio A, Salera C, Pazzaglia M Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:927622.

PMID: 36277056 PMC: 9579344. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.927622.


On the processing of optimal performances: Studying arousal evoked by being correct and fast.

Valt C, Sturmer B Brain Behav. 2021; 11(6):e02162.

PMID: 33960718 PMC: 8213646. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2162.

References
1.
Walentowska W, Moors A, Paul K, Pourtois G . Goal relevance influences performance monitoring at the level of the FRN and P3 components. Psychophysiology. 2016; 53(7):1020-33. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12651. View

2.
Heldmann M, Russeler J, Munte T . Internal and external information in error processing. BMC Neurosci. 2008; 9:33. PMC: 2291472. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-33. View

3.
Benedek M, Kaernbach C . A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. J Neurosci Methods. 2010; 190(1):80-91. PMC: 2892750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028. View

4.
Oliveira F, McDonald J, Goodman D . Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(12):1994-2004. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1994. View

5.
Spruit I, Wilderjans T, van Steenbergen H . Heart work after errors: Behavioral adjustment following error commission involves cardiac effort. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018; 18(2):375-388. PMC: 5889424. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0576-6. View