» Articles » PMID: 33948883

Listener Expectations and the Perceptual Accommodation of Talker Variability: A Pre-registered Replication

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2021 May 5
PMID 33948883
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Researchers have hypothesized that in order to accommodate variability in how talkers produce their speech sounds, listeners must perform a process of talker normalization. Consistent with this proposal, several studies have shown that spoken word recognition is slowed when speech is produced by multiple talkers compared with when all speech is produced by one talker (a multitalker processing cost). Nusbaum and colleagues have argued that talker normalization is modulated by attention (e.g., Nusbaum & Morin, 1992, Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, pp. 113-134). Some of the strongest evidence for this claim is from a speeded monitoring study where a group of participants who expected to hear two talkers showed a multitalker processing cost, but a separate group who expected one talker did not (Magnuson & Nusbaum, 2007, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33[2], 391-409). In that study, however, the sample size was small and the crucial interaction was not significant. In this registered report, we present the results of a well-powered attempt to replicate those findings. In contrast to the previous study, we did not observe multitalker processing costs in either of our groups. To rule out the possibility that the null result was due to task constraints, we conducted a second experiment using a speeded classification task. As in Experiment 1, we found no influence of expectations on talker normalization, with no multitalker processing cost observed in either group. Our data suggest that the previous findings of Magnuson and Nusbaum (2007) be regarded with skepticism and that talker normalization may not be permeable to high-level expectations.

Citing Articles

Multiple talker processing in autistic adult listeners.

Alispahic S, Pellicano E, Cutler A, Antoniou M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14698.

PMID: 38926416 PMC: 11208580. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62429-w.


Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.

Kapadia A, Tin J, Perrachione T J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 153(1):209.

PMID: 36732274 PMC: 9836727. DOI: 10.1121/10.0016611.


Attention, task demands, and multitalker processing costs in speech perception.

Saltzman D, Luthra S, Myers E, Magnuson J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(12):1673-1680.

PMID: 34881952 PMC: 10249717. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000963.

References
1.
Choi J, Perrachione T . Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech. Cognition. 2019; 192:103982. PMC: 6732236. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.019. View

2.
Saltzman D, Myers E . Listeners are initially flexible in updating phonetic beliefs over time. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(4):1354-1364. PMC: 8667591. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01885-1. View

3.
Pufahl A, Samuel A . How lexical is the lexicon? Evidence for integrated auditory memory representations. Cogn Psychol. 2014; 70:1-30. PMC: 4048665. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.001. View

4.
Saltzman D, Luthra S, Myers E, Magnuson J . Attention, task demands, and multitalker processing costs in speech perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(12):1673-1680. PMC: 10249717. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000963. View

5.
Nygaard L, Sommers M, Pisoni D . SPEECH PERCEPTION AS A TALKER-CONTINGENT PROCESS. Psychol Sci. 2011; 5(1):42-46. PMC: 3081685. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.x. View