» Articles » PMID: 33945551

Exhalatory Dynamic Interactions Between Patients Connected to a Shared Ventilation Device

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 May 4
PMID 33945551
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this work a shared pressure-controlled ventilation device for two patients is considered. By the use of different valves incorporated to the circuit, the device enables the restriction of possible cross contamination and the individualization of tidal volumes, driving pressures, and positive end expiratory pressure PEEP. Possible interactions in the expiratory dynamics of different pairs of patients are evaluated in terms of the characteristic exhalatory times. These characteristic times can not be easily established using simple linear lumped element models. For this purpose, a 1D model using the Hydraulic and Mechanical libraries in Matlab Simulink was developed. In this sense, experiments accompany this study to validate the model and characterize the different valves of the circuit. Our results show that connecting two patients in parallel to a ventilator always resulted in delays of time during the exhalation. The size of this effect depends on different parameters associated with the patients, the circuit and the ventilator. The dynamics of the exhalation of both patients is determined by the ratios between patients exhalatory resistances, compliances, driving pressures and PEEPs. Adverse effects on exhalations became less noticeable when respiratory parameters of both patients were similar, flow resistances of valves added to the circuit were negligible, and when the ventilator exhalatory valve resistance was also negligible. The asymmetries of driving pressures, compliances or resistances exacerbated the possibility of auto-PEEP and the increase in relaxation times became greater in one patient than in the other. In contrast, exhalatory dynamics were less sensitive to the ratio of PEEP imposed to the patients.

Citing Articles

Ventilator output splitting interface 'ACRA': Description and evaluation in lung simulators and in an experimental ARDS animal model.

Otero P, Tarragona L, Zaccagnini A, Verdier N, Ceballos M, Gogniat E PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256469.

PMID: 34432821 PMC: 8386869. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256469.


Sharing Mechanical Ventilator: In Vitro Evaluation of Circuit Cross-Flows and Patient Interactions.

Colombo S, Battistin M, Carlesso E, Vivona L, Carfagna F, Valsecchi C Membranes (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34357197 PMC: 8307053. DOI: 10.3390/membranes11070547.

References
1.
Kayaleh R, Wilson A . Mechanisms of expiratory valves resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988; 137(6):1390-4. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.6.1390. View

2.
Neyman G, Irvin C . A single ventilator for multiple simulated patients to meet disaster surge. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(11):1246-9. PMC: 7164837. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.009. View

3.
Jiao G, Newhart J . Bench study on active exhalation valve performance. Respir Care. 2008; 53(12):1697-702. View

4.
Plummer A, du Bois J, Flynn J, Roesner J, Lee S, Magee P . A simple method to estimate flow restriction for dual ventilation of dissimilar patients: The BathRC model. PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0242123. PMC: 7668571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242123. View

5.
Venegas J, Harris R, Simon B . A comprehensive equation for the pulmonary pressure-volume curve. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998; 84(1):389-95. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.389. View