» Articles » PMID: 33935660

The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 May 3
PMID 33935660
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For more than two decades, there has been converging evidence for an essential role of the cerebellum in non-motor functions. The cerebellum is not only important in learning and sensorimotor processes, some growing evidences show its implication in conditional learning and reward, which allows building our expectations about behavioral outcomes. More recent work has demonstrated that the cerebellum is also required for the sense of agency, a cognitive process that allows recognizing an action as our own, suggesting that the cerebellum might serve as an interface between sensorimotor function and cognition. A unifying model that would explain the role of the cerebellum across these processes has not been fully established. Nonetheless, an important heritage was given by the field of motor control: the forward model theory. This theory stipulates that movements are controlled based on the constant interactions between our organism and its environment through feedforward and feedback loops. Feedforward loops predict what is going to happen, while feedback loops confront the prediction with what happened so that we can react accordingly. From an anatomical point of view, the cerebellum is at an ideal location at the interface between the motor and sensory systems, as it is connected to cerebral, striatal, and spinal entities parallel loops, so that it can link sensory and motor systems with cognitive processes. Recent findings showing that the cerebellum participates in building the sense of agency as a predictive and comparator system will be reviewed together with past work on motor control within the context of the forward model theory.

Citing Articles

Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes.

Roy Choudhury N, Hilber P, Cendelin J Cerebellum. 2025; 24(2):54.

PMID: 40016581 PMC: 11868327. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-025-01810-5.


Can attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder be considered a form of cerebellar dysfunction?.

Isaac V, Lopez V, Escobar M Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1453025.

PMID: 39911701 PMC: 11794510. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1453025.


Predictive coding and attention in developmental cognitive neuroscience and perspectives for neurodevelopmental disorders.

Marais A, Roche-Labarbe N Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101519.

PMID: 39864185 PMC: 11795830. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101519.


Causally Mapping the Cerebellum in Children and Young Adults: from Motor to Cognition.

Veyrie M, Beffara B, Richard N, Mottolese C, Szathmari A, Di Rocco F Cerebellum. 2025; 24(2):31.

PMID: 39815003 PMC: 11735598. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-024-01778-8.


Mutation in Prkra results in cerebellar abnormality and reduced eIF2α phosphorylation in a model of DYT-PRKRA.

Burnett S, Culver A, Simon T, Rowson T, Frederick K, Palmer K Dis Model Mech. 2024; 17(11).

PMID: 39512178 PMC: 11625895. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.050929.


References
1.
Waszak F, Cardoso-Leite P, Hughes G . Action effect anticipation: neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(2):943-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004. View

2.
Blakemore S, Wolpert D, Frith C . Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 1(7):635-40. DOI: 10.1038/2870. View

3.
Wolpert D, Flanagan J . Motor prediction. Curr Biol. 2001; 11(18):R729-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00432-8. View

4.
Bhanpuri N, Okamura A, Bastian A . Predictive modeling by the cerebellum improves proprioception. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(36):14301-6. PMC: 3761044. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-13.2013. View

5.
Zito G, Wiest R, Aybek S . Neural correlates of sense of agency in motor control: A neuroimaging meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234321. PMC: 7274441. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234321. View