» Articles » PMID: 33916571

In Vitro Screening of East Asian Plant Extracts for Potential Use in Reducing Ruminal Methane Production

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33916571
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Indiscriminate use of antibiotics can result in antibiotic residues in animal products; thus, plant compounds may be better alternative sources for mitigating methane (CH) production. An in vitro screening experiment was conducted to evaluate the potential application of 152 dry methanolic or ethanolic extracts from 137 plant species distributed in East Asian countries as anti-methanogenic additives in ruminant feed. The experimental material consisted of 200 mg total mixed ration, 20 mg plant extract, and 30 mL diluted ruminal fluid-buffer mixture in 60 mL serum bottles that were sealed with rubber stoppers and incubated at 39 °C for 24 h. Among the tested extracts, eight extracts decreased CH production by >20%, compared to the corresponding controls: stems of var. stems of , fruit of , seeds of , seeds of , leaves of , stem and bark of , and stems of . A confirmation assay of the eight plant extracts at a dosage of 10 mg with four replications repeated on 3 different days revealed that the extracts decreased CH concentration in the total gas (7-15%) and total CH production (17-37%), compared to the control. This is the first report to identify the anti-methanogenic activities of eight potential plant extracts. All extracts decreased ammonia (NH-N) concentrations. Negative effects on total gas and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production were also noted for all extracts that were rich in hydrolysable tannins and total saponins or fatty acids. The underlying modes of action differed among plants: extracts from var. , and resulted in a decrease in total methanogen or the protozoan population ( < 0.05) but extracts from other plants did not. Furthermore, extracts from decreased the population of total protozoa and increased the proportion of propionate among VFAs ( < 0.05). Identifying bioactive compounds in seeds of by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis revealed enrichment of linoleic acid (18:2). Overall, seeds of could be a possible alternative to ionophores or oil seeds to mitigate ruminal CH production.

Citing Articles

Application of propionate-producing bacterial consortium in ruminal methanogenesis inhibited environment with bromoethanesulfonate as a methanogen direct inhibitor.

Jeong J, Yu C, Kang R, Kim M, Park T Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1422474.

PMID: 39444738 PMC: 11497462. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1422474.


Methane emission, nitrogen excretion, and energy partitioning in Hanwoo steers fed a typical TMR diet supplemented with seeds.

Bharanidharan R, Xaysana P, Hong W, Kim T, Byun J, Lee Y Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1467077.

PMID: 39380775 PMC: 11459670. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1467077.


The use of microencapsulated banana flower powder pellet on in vitro ruminal fermentation, digestibility, microbial diversity, and methane production.

Dagaew G, Kunhareang S, Phupaboon S, Matra M, Sommai S, Suriyapha C Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(8):263.

PMID: 39302552 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04101-z.


Effects of dietary supplementation with 3-nitrooxypropanol on enteric methane production, rumen fermentation, and performance in young growing beef cattle offered a 50:50 forage:concentrate diet.

Kirwan S, Tamassia L, Walker N, Karagiannis A, Kindermann M, Waters S J Anim Sci. 2023; 102.

PMID: 38038711 PMC: 11282959. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad399.


Influence of Fodder on Rumen Digestion and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Production.

Vargas-Ortiz L, Andrade-Yucailla V, Barros-Rodriguez M, Lima-Orozco R, Macias-Rodriguez E, Contreras-Barros K Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(17).

PMID: 36077970 PMC: 9454763. DOI: 10.3390/ani12172250.


References
1.
Dohme F, Machmuller A, Wasserfallen A, Kreuzer M . Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001; 32(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00863.x. View

2.
Shi W, Moon C, Leahy S, Kang D, Froula J, Kittelmann S . Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome. Genome Res. 2014; 24(9):1517-25. PMC: 4158751. DOI: 10.1101/gr.168245.113. View

3.
Shen J, Liu Z, Yu Z, Zhu W . Monensin and Nisin Affect Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota Differently . Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:1111. PMC: 5472720. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01111. View

4.
Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan L . Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(20):6524-33. PMC: 2765141. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02815-08. View

5.
CHANEY A, MARBACH E . Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962; 8:130-2. View