» Articles » PMID: 33907364

A Pilot Study on EEG-Based Evaluation of Visually Induced Motion Sickness

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 28
PMID 33907364
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The most prominent problem in virtual reality (VR) technology is that users may experience motion sickness-like symptoms when they immerse into a VR environment. These symptoms are recognized as visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) or virtual reality motion sickness (VRMS). The objectives of this study were to investigate the association between the electroencephalogram (EEG) and subjectively rated VIMS level (VIMSL) and find the EEG markers for VIMS evaluation. In this study, a VR-based vehicle-driving simulator (VDS) was used to induce VIMS symptoms, and a wearable EEG device with four electrodes, the Muse, was used to collect EEG data of subjects. Our results suggest that individual tolerance, susceptibility, and recoverability to VIMS varied largely among subjects; the following markers were shown to be significantly different from no-VIMS and VIMS states (P < 0.05): (1) Means of gravity frequency (GF) for theta@FP1, alpha@TP9, alpha@FP2, alpha@TP10, and beta@FP1; (2) Standard deviation of GF for alpha@TP9, alpha@FP1, alpha@FP2, alpha@TP10, and alpha@(FP2-FP1); (3) Standard deviation of power spectral entropy (PSE) for FP1; (4) Means of Kolmogorov complexity (KC) for TP9, FP1, and FP2. These results also demonstrate that it is feasible to perform VIMS evaluation using an EEG device with a small number of electrodes.

Citing Articles

Reduction in EEG theta power as a potential marker for spatial disorientation during flight.

Geva G, Getter N, Blecher B, Ben-Ari O, Gordon B, Nakdimon I Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1682.

PMID: 39799201 PMC: 11724846. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85219-4.


Combined Method Comprising Low Burden Physiological Measurements with Dry Electrodes and Machine Learning for Classification of Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Remote-Controlled Excavator.

Yoshioka N, Takeuchi H, Shu Y, Okamatsu T, Araki N, Kamakura Y Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409505 PMC: 11479346. DOI: 10.3390/s24196465.


Prediction and detection of virtual reality induced cybersickness: a spiking neural network approach using spatiotemporal EEG brain data and heart rate variability.

Yang A, Kasabov N, Cakmak Y Brain Inform. 2023; 10(1):15.

PMID: 37438494 PMC: 10338414. DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00192-w.


Determining Work-Rest Schedules for Visual Tasks That Use Optical Head-Mounted Displays Based on Visual Fatigue and Visually Induced Motion Sickness Recovery.

Hsiao C, Kuo C, Liou Y, Wang M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767244 PMC: 9914630. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031880.

References
1.
Cai H, Chen Y, Han J, Zhang X, Hu B . Study on Feature Selection Methods for Depression Detection Using Three-Electrode EEG Data. Interdiscip Sci. 2018; 10(3):558-565. DOI: 10.1007/s12539-018-0292-5. View

2.
Classen S, Bewernitz M, Shechtman O . Driving simulator sickness: an evidence-based review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther. 2011; 65(2):179-88. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000802. View

3.
Lin C, Huang K, Chao C, Chen J, Chiu T, Ko L . Tonic and phasic EEG and behavioral changes induced by arousing feedback. Neuroimage. 2010; 52(2):633-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.250. View

4.
Kennedy R, Drexler J, Kennedy R . Research in visually induced motion sickness. Appl Ergon. 2010; 41(4):494-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.11.006. View

5.
Chang C, Pan W, Tseng L, Stoffregen T . Postural activity and motion sickness during video game play in children and adults. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 217(2):299-309. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2993-4. View