» Articles » PMID: 20196298

Isolating the Effects of Vection and Optokinetic Nystagmus on Optokinetic Rotation-induced Motion Sickness

Overview
Journal Hum Factors
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Mar 4
PMID 20196298
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study investigates isolated effects of vection and optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) on visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) provoked by rotating optokinetic drum patterns.

Background: VIMS was the subject of recent standardization activities, but the effects of OKN have not been studied in the absence ofvection.

Method: Experiment 1 suppressed OKN by eye fixation and examined VIMS severity (both ordinal and ratio scale) and time spent in saturated vection at four pattern rotating velocities of 0, 2, 14, and 34 degrees per second (dps). Experiment 2 suppressed vection by adding a peripheral visual field rotating in the opposite direction to the rotating patterns. VIMS severity and OKN slow-phase velocity were studied at four rotating velocities of 0, 30, 60, and 90 dps.

Results: Results from Experiment 1 indicated that VIMS severity increased as the pattern velocity increased from 0 dps to 34 dps. Results from Experiment 2 indicated that as the velocity of the rotating pattern increased, the slow-phase velocity of OKN and the severity of VIMS increased and peaked in the 60-dps condition. In both experiments, ratio-scaled nausea data significantly correlated with ordinal-scaled nausea ratings.

Conclusion: VIMS can still occur in the absence of either vection or OKN. Interestingly, the profile of the summed results of the two experiments matches nicely with the profile reported by Hu et al. in which neither OKN nor vection were controlled.

Application: Potential applications include modeling and reduction of VIMS in computer gaming environments.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting vection and motion sickness in a passive virtual reality driving simulation.

Hughes B, Naeem H, Davidenko N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30214.

PMID: 39632919 PMC: 11618617. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80778-4.


A Pilot Study on EEG-Based Evaluation of Visually Induced Motion Sickness.

Liu R, Xu M, Zhang Y, Peli E, Hwang A J Imaging Sci Technol. 2021; 64(2):205011-2050110.

PMID: 33907364 PMC: 8075303. DOI: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2020.64.2.020501.


Beyond sensory conflict: The role of beliefs and perception in motion sickness.

Nooij S, Bockisch C, Bulthoff H, Straumann D PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0245295.

PMID: 33465124 PMC: 7815099. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245295.


Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review.

Weech S, Kenny S, Barnett-Cowan M Front Psychol. 2019; 10:158.

PMID: 30778320 PMC: 6369189. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158.


The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Seno T, Sawai K, Kanaya H, Wakebe T, Ogawa M, Fujii Y Iperception. 2017; 8(6):2041669517742176.

PMID: 29204263 PMC: 5703118. DOI: 10.1177/2041669517742176.