» Articles » PMID: 33893121

Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Responses to Carbon and Nitrogen Sources in Methylomicrobium Album BG8

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 24
PMID 33893121
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methanotrophs use methane as their sole carbon and energy source and represent an attractive platform for converting single-carbon feedstocks into value-added compounds. Optimizing these species for biotechnological applications involves choosing an optimal growth substrate based on an understanding of cellular responses to different nutrients. Although many studies of methanotrophs have examined growth rate, yield, and central carbon flux in cultures grown with different carbon and nitrogen sources, few studies have examined more global cellular responses to different media. Here, we evaluated global transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles of Methylomicrobium album BG8 when grown with methane or methanol as the carbon source and nitrate or ammonium as the nitrogen source. We identified five key physiological changes during growth on methanol: BG8 cultures upregulated transcripts for the Entner-Doudoroff and pentose phosphate pathways for sugar catabolism, produced more ribosomes, remodeled the phospholipid membrane, activated various stress response systems, and upregulated glutathione-dependent formaldehyde detoxification. When using ammonium, BG8 upregulated hydroxylamine dehydrogenase () and overall central metabolic activity, whereas when using nitrate, cultures upregulated genes for nitrate assimilation and conversion. Overall, we identified several nutrient source-specific responses that could provide a valuable basis for future research on the biotechnological optimization of these species. Methanotrophs are gaining increasing interest for their biotechnological potential to convert single-carbon compounds into value-added products such as industrial chemicals, fuels, and bioplastics. Optimizing these species for biotechnological applications requires a detailed understanding of how cellular activity and metabolism vary across different growth substrates. Although each of the two most commonly used carbon sources (methane or methanol) and nitrogen sources (ammonium or nitrate) in methanotroph growth media have well-described advantages and disadvantages in an industrial context, their effects on global cellular activity remain poorly characterized. Here, we comprehensively describe the transcriptomic and metabolomic changes that characterize the growth of an industrially promising methanotroph strain on multiple combinations of carbon and nitrogen sources. Our results represent a more holistic evaluation of cellular activity than previous studies of core metabolic pathways and provide a valuable basis for the future biotechnological optimization of these species.

Citing Articles

Leveraging genome-scale metabolic models to understand aerobic methanotrophs.

Wutkowska M, Tlaskal V, Bordel S, Stein L, Nweze J, Daebeler A ISME J. 2024; 18(1).

PMID: 38861460 PMC: 11195481. DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae102.


Current advances for omics-guided process optimization of microbial manufacturing.

Wan S, Liu X, Sun W, Lv B, Li C Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 10(1):30.

PMID: 38647562 PMC: 10992112. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-023-00647-2.


A comparative analysis of soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure among four shelterbelt species in the northeast China plain.

Yang J, Ding D, Zhang X, Gu H Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(4):e0368323.

PMID: 38376351 PMC: 10986494. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03683-23.


State-of the-Art Constraint-Based Modeling of Microbial Metabolism: From Basics to Context-Specific Models with a Focus on Methanotrophs.

Kulyashov M, Kolmykov S, Khlebodarova T, Akberdin I Microorganisms. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38138131 PMC: 10745598. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11122987.


Transcriptional and metabolomic responses of Bath to nitrogen source and temperature downshift.

Bedekar A, Deewan A, Jagtap S, Parker D, Liu P, Mackie R Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1259015.

PMID: 37928661 PMC: 10623323. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1259015.


References
1.
McCarthy D, Chen Y, Smyth G . Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(10):4288-97. PMC: 3378882. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks042. View

2.
He L, Fu Y, Lidstrom M . Quantifying Methane and Methanol Metabolism of "" 5GB1C under Substrate Limitation. mSystems. 2019; 4(6). PMC: 6906744. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00748-19. View

3.
Yu G, Wang L, Han Y, He Q . clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16(5):284-7. PMC: 3339379. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. View

4.
Yang S, Matsen J, Konopka M, Green-Saxena A, Clubb J, Sadilek M . Global Molecular Analyses of Methane Metabolism in Methanotrophic Alphaproteobacterium, Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Part II. Metabolomics and 13C-Labeling Study. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4:70. PMC: 3615224. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00070. View

5.
Sporing I, Felgner S, Preusse M, Eckweiler D, Rohde M, Haussler S . Regulation of Flagellum Biosynthesis in Response to Cell Envelope Stress in Serovar Typhimurium. mBio. 2018; 9(3). PMC: 5930307. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00736-17. View