» Articles » PMID: 33884719

Real-world Therapeutic Management and Evolution of Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Primary Care and Urology in Spain

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Apr 22
PMID 33884719
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe the real-world therapeutic management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (LUTS/BPH) attending primary care and urology clinics in Spain.

Methods: This observational, retrospective, multicentre study included men ≥50 years of age diagnosed with LUTS/BPH (≤8 years prior to study visit) (N = 670). Therapeutic management according to healthcare service (primary care vs. urology clinics) or progression criteria, proportion of patients with treatment change, patient profile according to therapy and evolution of LUTS severity were assessed.

Results: Overall differences were noticed in the management of patients between healthcare service (P < .001) and with or without progression criteria (P < .05). Most patients received pharmacological treatment at diagnosis (70.7%; 474/670), which increased at study visit (81.6%; 547/670) with overall similar profiles between primary care and urology clinics for each therapy. α1-Blockers were the most used pharmacological treatment across healthcare settings at diagnosis (61.8%; 293/474) and study visit (51%; 279/547). Only 27.1% (57/210) of patients with progression criteria at diagnosis and 35.6% (99/278) at study visit received 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) alone or in combination with a α1-blocker. Overall, most patients did not change treatment (60%; 402/670) with a trend of more patients worsening in symptoms when not receiving α1-blocker plus 5ARI combination therapy.

Conclusion: Most patients with LUTS/BPH received pharmacological treatment; however, most men with progression criteria did not receive a 5ARI alone or in combination. These results support the need to reinforce both primary care and urologists existing clinical guideline recommendations for the appropriate medical management of patients with LUTS/BPH.

Citing Articles

A real-world evidence study of interhospital variability in the surgical treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: the REVALURO study.

Ivan P, Alberto B, Lluis P, Maurizio D, Jose Luis G, Francisco Javier V Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 57(3):775-784.

PMID: 39470938 PMC: 11821794. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04239-7.


Phloretin in Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer: A Contemporary Systematic Review.

Yang C, Ou Y, Lin C, Lin Y, Tung M, Yu C Life (Basel). 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35888117 PMC: 9322491. DOI: 10.3390/life12071029.


Phloretin Ameliorates Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Rats by Regulating the Inflammatory Response, Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis.

Hsu C, Lin Y, Weng W, Panny L, Chen H, Tung M Life (Basel). 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34440487 PMC: 8399389. DOI: 10.3390/life11080743.


Real-world therapeutic management and evolution of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care and urology in Spain.

Minana B, Molero J, Agra Rolan A, Martinez-Fornes M, Cuervo Pinto R, Lorite Mingot D Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75(8):e14250.

PMID: 33884719 PMC: 8365648. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14250.

References
1.
Roehrborn C . Benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview. Rev Urol. 2006; 7 Suppl 9:S3-S14. PMC: 1477638. View

2.
OLeary M . Lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia: maintaining symptom control and reducing complications. Urology. 2003; 62(3 Suppl 1):15-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00480-1. View

3.
Minana B, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Prieto M, Pedrosa E . Severity profiles in patients diagnosed of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Spain. Actas Urol Esp. 2013; 37(9):544-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.03.003. View

4.
Bartsch G, Fitzpatrick J, Schalken J, Isaacs J, Nordling J, Roehrborn C . Consensus statement: the role of prostate-specific antigen in managing the patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2004; 93 Suppl 1:27-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04646.x. View

5.
Rensing A, Kuxhausen A, Vetter J, Strope S . Differences in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Comparing the Primary Care Physician and the Urologist. Urol Pract. 2017; 4(3):193-199. PMC: 5451141. DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.07.002. View