» Articles » PMID: 33878925

From Foraging Trails to Transport Networks: How the Quality-distance Trade-off Shapes Network Structure

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Apr 21
PMID 33878925
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biological systems are typically dependent on transportation networks for the efficient distribution of resources and information. Revealing the decentralized mechanisms underlying the generative process of these networks is key in our global understanding of their functions and is of interest to design, manage and improve human transport systems. Ants are a particularly interesting taxon to address these issues because some species build multi-sink multi-source transport networks analogous to human ones. Here, by combining empirical field data and modelling at several scales of description, we show that pre-existing mechanisms of recruitment with positive feedback involved in foraging can account for the structure of complex ant transport networks. Specifically, we find that emergent group-level properties of these empirical networks, such as robustness, efficiency and cost, can arise from models built on simple individual-level behaviour addressing a quality-distance trade-off by the means of pheromone trails. Our work represents a first step in developing a theory for the generation of effective multi-source multi-sink transport networks based on combining exploration and positive reinforcement of best sources.

Citing Articles

Random walks with spatial and temporal resets can explain individual and colony-level searching patterns in ants.

Lecheval V, Robinson E, Mann R J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240149.

PMID: 39081113 PMC: 11289642. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0149.


Competition and habitat availability interact to structure arboreal ant communities across scales of ecological organization.

Adams B, Gora E, Donaldson-Matasci M, Robinson E, Powell S Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2007):20231290.

PMID: 37752835 PMC: 10523074. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1290.


Foraging strategies of fungal mycelial networks: responses to quantity and distance of new resources.

Fukasawa Y, Ishii K Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1244673.

PMID: 37691819 PMC: 10483288. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1244673.


The evolution of intergroup cooperation.

Rodrigues A, Barker J, Robinson E Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1874):20220074.

PMID: 36802776 PMC: 9939261. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0074.


From inter-group conflict to inter-group cooperation: insights from social insects.

Rodrigues A, Barker J, Robinson E Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1851):20210466.

PMID: 35369743 PMC: 8977659. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0466.


References
1.
Heredia A, Detrain C . Influence of seed size and seed nature on recruitment in the polymorphic harvester ant Messor barbarus. Behav Processes. 2005; 70(3):289-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.08.001. View

2.
Tero A, Takagi S, Saigusa T, Ito K, Bebber D, Fricker M . Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design. Science. 2010; 327(5964):439-42. DOI: 10.1126/science.1177894. View

3.
Beekman M, Sumpter D, Ratnieks F . Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(17):9703-6. PMC: 55516. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161285298. View

4.
Latty T, Ramsch K, Ito K, Nakagaki T, Sumpter D, Middendorf M . Structure and formation of ant transportation networks. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 8(62):1298-306. PMC: 3140716. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0612. View

5.
Banavar J, Maritan A, Rinaldo A . Size and form in efficient transportation networks. Nature. 1999; 399(6732):130-2. DOI: 10.1038/20144. View