» Articles » PMID: 33878210

Early Ultrasound Evaluation Identifies Excellent Responders to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Among Patients with Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Abstract

Background: Heterogeneity exists in the response of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to standard anthracycline (AC)/taxane-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), with 40% to 50% of patients having a pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Early assessment of the imaging response during NAST may identify a subset of TNBCs that are likely to have a pCR upon completion of treatment. The authors aimed to evaluate the performance of early ultrasound (US) after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant NAST in identifying excellent responders to NAST among patients with TNBC.

Methods: Two hundred fifteen patients with TNBC were enrolled in the ongoing ARTEMIS (A Robust TNBC Evaluation Framework to Improve Survival) clinical trial. The patients were divided into a discovery cohort (n = 107) and a validation cohort (n = 108). A receiver operating characteristic analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to model the probability of a pCR on the basis of the tumor volume reduction (TVR) percentage by US from the baseline to after 2 cycles of AC.

Results: Overall, 39.3% of the patients (42 of 107) achieved a pCR. A positive predictive value (PPV) analysis identified a cutoff point of 80% TVR after 2 cycles; the pCR rate was 77% (17 of 22) in patients with a TVR ≥ 80%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < .0001). In the validation cohort, the pCR rate was 44%. The PPV for pCR with a TVR ≥ 80% after 2 cycles was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%), and the AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87; P < .0001).

Conclusions: The TVR percentage by US evaluation after 2 cycles of NAST may be a cost-effective early imaging biomarker for a pCR to AC/taxane-based NAST.

Citing Articles

Dynamic ultrasound-based modeling predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.

Wang X, Zhang Y, Yang M, Wu N, Wang S, Chen H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31644.

PMID: 39738182 PMC: 11685924. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80409-y.


Correlation between Baseline Conventional Ultrasounds, Shear-Wave Elastography Indicators, and Neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Wang S, Lan Z, Wan X, Liu J, Wen W, Peng Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37891999 PMC: 10605864. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203178.


Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: an evaluation of its efficacy and research progress.

Chen Y, Qi Y, Wang K Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1169010.

PMID: 37854685 PMC: 10579937. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1169010.


Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Breast Cancer After Two Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Tumor Reduction Rate: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Yao L, Liu X, Wang M, Yu K, Xu S, Qiu P J Breast Cancer. 2023; 26(2):136-151.

PMID: 37051647 PMC: 10139844. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e12.


Changes in the tumor oxygenation but not in the tumor volume and tumor vascularization reflect early response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Pavlov M, Bavrina A, Plekhanov V, Golubyatnikov G, Orlova A, Subochev P Breast Cancer Res. 2023; 25(1):12.

PMID: 36717842 PMC: 9887770. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01607-6.


References
1.
Li X, Arlinghaus L, Ayers G, Chakravarthy A, Abramson R, Abramson V . DCE-MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pilot study findings. Magn Reson Med. 2013; 71(4):1592-602. PMC: 3742614. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24782. View

2.
Savaridas S, Sim Y, Vinnicombe S, Purdie C, Thompson A, Evans A . Are baseline ultrasound and mammographic features associated with rates of pathological completes response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer?. Cancer Imaging. 2019; 19(1):67. PMC: 6802305. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0251-3. View

3.
Eom H, Cha J, Choi W, Chae E, Shin H, Kim H . Predictive Clinicopathologic and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Findings for Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 208(6):W225-W230. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.17125. View

4.
OFlynn E, Collins D, dArcy J, Schmidt M, de Souza N . Multi-parametric MRI in the early prediction of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Value of non-modelled parameters. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(4):837-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.006. View

5.
Li H, Yao L, Jin P, Hu L, Li X, Guo T . MRI and PET/CT for evaluation of the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast. 2018; 40:106-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.018. View