» Articles » PMID: 31639053

Are Baseline Ultrasound and Mammographic Features Associated with Rates of Pathological Completes Response in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer?

Overview
Journal Cancer Imaging
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2019 Oct 23
PMID 31639053
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increasing numbers of breast cancer patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We seek to investigate whether baseline mammographic and ultrasound features are associated with complete pathological response (pCR) after NACT.

Methods: A database of NACT patients was reviewed. Baseline imaging parameters assessed were ultrasound: posterior effect; echo pattern; margin and lesion diameter; mammography: spiculation and microcalcification. Core biopsy grade and immunophenotype were documented. Data were analysed for the whole study group and by immunophenotype.

Results: Of the 222 cancers, 83 (37%) were triple negative (TN), 61 (27%) ER positive/HER-2 negative and 78 (35%) HER-2 positive. A pCR occurred in 46 of 222 cancers (21%). For the whole group, response was associated with high core biopsy grade (grade 3 vs. grade 1 or 2) (26% vs. 9%, p = 0.0044), absence of posterior shadowing on ultrasound (26% vs. 10%, p <  0.001) and the absence of mammographic spiculation (26 vs. 6%, p <  0.001). Within the HER-2 positive group; the absence of shadowing and spiculation remained highly associated with pCR, in addition to small ultrasound size (AUC = 0.71, p < 0.001) and the absence of microcalcification (39% vs. 21%, p < 0.02). On multivariable analysis absence of spiculation and core grade remained significant for the whole cohort, size and absence of spiculation remained significant for HER-2 positive tumours. No feature predicted pCR in TN tumours.

Conclusion: A pCR is less likely when there is mammographic spiculation. Small ultrasound size is associated with pCR in HER-2 positive tumours. These findings may be helpful when discussing NACT and surgical options with patients.

Trial Registration: UK Clinical Trials Gateway: registration number 16712.

Citing Articles

Integrating ultrasound radiomics and clinicopathological features for machine learning-based survival prediction in patients with nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Wenwen , Jiang Z, Liu J, Liu D, Li Y, He Y BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):291.

PMID: 39966783 PMC: 11837701. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13635-w.


The Role of Ultrasound Features in Predicting the Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

El-Diasty M, Ageely G, Sawan S, Karsou R, Bakhsh S, Alharthy A Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49084.

PMID: 38024010 PMC: 10660791. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49084.


Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Qi X, Chen J, Wei S, Ni J, Song L, Jin C BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e074874.

PMID: 37996220 PMC: 10668253. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074874.


Prediction of clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy in advanced breast cancer by baseline B-mode ultrasound, shear-wave elastography, and pathological information.

Wang S, Wen W, Zhao H, Liu J, Wan X, Lan Z Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1096571.

PMID: 37228493 PMC: 10203521. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1096571.


Predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A nomogram combining clinical features and ultrasound semantics in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Wang K, Meng Y, Yu Y, Cai W, Wang X, Cao X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1117538.

PMID: 37035201 PMC: 10075137. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1117538.


References
1.
Houssami N, Macaskill P, von Minckwitz G, Marinovich M, Mamounas E . Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(18):3342-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.023. View

2.
Ring A, Smith I, Ashley S, Fulford L, Lakhani S . Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004; 91(12):2012-7. PMC: 2409783. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602235. View

3.
Krizmanich-Conniff K, Paramagul C, Patterson S, Helvie M, Roubidoux M, Myles J . Triple receptor-negative breast cancer: imaging and clinical characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(2):458-64. PMC: 3638984. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.6096. View

4.
Bennett R, Evans A, Kutt E, Record C, Bobrow L, Ellis I . Pathological and mammographic prognostic factors for screen detected cancers in a multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years. Breast. 2011; 20(6):525-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.05.008. View

5.
Yardley D, Peacock N, Shastry M, Burris 3rd H, Bechhold R, Hendricks C . A phase II trial of ixabepilone and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer: correlation of pathologic complete response with the 21-gene recurrence score. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 154(2):299-308. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3613-y. View