» Articles » PMID: 33874884

Impact of Erenumab on Acute Medication Usage and Health Care Resource Utilization Among Migraine Patients: a US Claims Database Study

Overview
Journal J Headache Pain
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Apr 20
PMID 33874884
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Erenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. This study aimed to evaluate real-world evidence on the impact of erenumab on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among migraine patients.

Methods: This retrospective effectiveness study utilized the US Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database to identify migraine patients initiating erenumab between May 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. Patients had to be at least 18 years old, with a minimum of three doses for erenumab in the 6-month post-index period and continuous medical/pharmacy coverage in the 12-month pre- and 6-month post-index period. The date of the first claim for erenumab served as the index date. Use of acute medications overall and at different drug class level, and HCRU were compared during the 6-month pre- vs. post-index period. Impact of erenumab on a composite endpoint of three possible events: 1) outpatient visit with a diagnosis of migraine and an associated acute medication claim within 7 days of the visit, 2) hospital admission with a primary diagnosis for migraine, or 3) emergency room visit with a primary diagnosis for migraine (any events that occurred ≤3 days apart were counted only once) was also evaluated.

Results: The analysis included 3171 identified patients. At 6 months, following initiation of erenumab, acute medication use including the number of types of acute medication, number of claims of each medication and % of patients who received acute medication, and HCRU were significantly decreased. For the composite outcome, the mean number of events decreased from 1.03 to 0.77 (rate ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.79; P < 0.0001). A decrease in the proportion of patients with any of the three events was also observed (52.7% vs. 39.5%, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, erenumab was associated with significantly reduced acute medication use and HCRU in a real-world setting, hence significantly reducing the burden of the disease. A composite endpoint could be used as a proxy to evaluate the burden of migraine attacks; however, further research is needed.

Citing Articles

US Real-World Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Addition of Fremanezumab for Preventive Treatment in Patients Using Gepants for Acute Treatment of Migraine: Results From a Retrospective Chart Review.

Eugeni P, Rooney M, Saikali N, Niu Z, Driessen M, Krasenbaum L Adv Ther. 2025; 42(2):1207-1221.

PMID: 39775579 PMC: 11787160. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03063-w.


Factors influencing utilization of healthcare services for internal migrant older adults in Xuzhou, China: based on Anderson's model.

Li G, Qi Z, Yu W, Wang Q, Hou H, Miao C Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1378790.

PMID: 39639911 PMC: 11617360. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378790.


Marginal health care expenditures and health-related quality of life burden in patients with migraine.

Masurkar P, Goswami S J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024; 30(10):1149-1159.

PMID: 39321120 PMC: 11426362. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1149.


Changes in Use of Migraine Medications, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Associated Direct Costs Over 12 Months Following Initiation of Erenumab: A US Retrospective Real-World Analysis.

Urman R, Princic N, Vuvu F, Patel L, Oh S, Chandler D Pain Ther. 2024; 13(5):1299-1313.

PMID: 39177937 PMC: 11393376. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00644-z.


Health care resource utilization and direct costs incurred over 24 months after initiating galcanezumab or standard-of-care preventive migraine treatments in the United States.

Varnado O, Vu M, Buysman E, Kim G, Allenback G, Hoyt M J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024; 30(8):792-804.

PMID: 39088336 PMC: 11293767. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8.792.


References
1.
. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38(1):1-211. DOI: 10.1177/0333102417738202. View

2.
Lanteri-Minet M . Economic burden and costs of chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 18(1):385. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-013-0385-0. View

3.
Loder E, Burch R, Rizzoli P . The 2012 AHS/AAN guidelines for prevention of episodic migraine: a summary and comparison with other recent clinical practice guidelines. Headache. 2012; 52(6):930-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02185.x. View

4.
. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-1259. PMC: 5605509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. View

5.
Berger A, Bloudek L, Varon S, Oster G . Adherence with migraine prophylaxis in clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012; 12(7):541-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00530.x. View