» Articles » PMID: 23458496

Patterns of Use and Reasons for Discontinuation of Prophylactic Medications for Episodic Migraine and Chronic Migraine: Results from the Second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II)

Overview
Journal Headache
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2013 Mar 6
PMID 23458496
Citations 160
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to characterize patterns of preventive medication use in persons with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM).

Background: Several classes of medications are used both on- and off-label for the prevention of migraine, including β-blockers (eg, propranolol, timolol), tricyclic antidepressants (eg, amitriptyline), anti-epileptic drugs (eg, topiramate, valproic acid), and neurotoxins (eg, onabotulinumtoxinA).

Methods: Preventive medication use and reasons for discontinuation were collected in an international, Web-based, cross-sectional survey of adults with migraine during 2010. Descriptive analyses were conducted on demographics and headache-related disability as measured by the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale, stratified by use of preventive medication, and EM or CM. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to assess predictors of preventive medication use.

Results: One thousand one hundred and sixty-five respondents completed the survey. Only 28.3% of EM and 44.8% of CM respondents were currently using preventive medication; any use of prophylaxis (prior or current) was reported by 43.4% of those with EM and 65.9% with CM. The mean number of prophylactic medications ever used was 2.92 for EM and 3.94 for CM. Antidepressants were used most frequently (EM 60.9%; CM 54.7%), followed by β-blockers (EM 35.4%; CM 36.8%) and anti-epileptics (EM 28.6%; CM 36.3%). Odds of preventive medication use were higher among CM than EM, adjusting for age, gender, race, years of daily headache, and country (odds ratio 2.72; 95% confidence interval 2.15 to 3.57). Greater headache-related disability and older age were also associated with greater odds of ever having used prophylaxis, regardless of headache frequency.

Conclusions: Less than half the persons with EM and CM were currently using preventive medication for migraine, with treatment rates being higher for CM, as expected. Those with CM tried more medications than those with EM, possibly reflecting higher levels of treatment need.

Citing Articles

Real-world application of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) as chronic migraine preventive therapy: Profiling responders and predictive factors.

Vigano A, Petolicchio B, Toscano M, Ruggero S, Di Giambattista R, Puma M Neurol Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 40048115 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-025-08075-0.


Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization by Gender and Migraine Frequency in Adult Patients Receiving Galcanezumab Versus Standard of Care Preventive Medications Over 24 months: A United States Retrospective Claims Study.

Varnado O, Vu M, Buysman E, Kim G, Allenback G, Hoyt M Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19:543-567.

PMID: 40046564 PMC: 11881638. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S492300.


Shift from chronic to episodic migraine frequency in a long-term phase 3 study of galcanezumab.

Diener H, Day K, Lipsius S, Aurora S, Hindiyeh N, Detke H J Headache Pain. 2025; 26(1):26.

PMID: 39901101 PMC: 11792349. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-01956-x.


Early Improvements With Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: Results From 3 Randomized Phase 3 Trials.

Lipton R, Gandhi P, Tassorelli C, Reuter U, Harriott A, Holle-Lee D Neurology. 2024; 104(2):e210212.

PMID: 39715475 PMC: 11668519. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210212.


Healthcare Utilization, Costs, and Treatment Discontinuation in Adults with Episodic Migraine Initiating Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant: A US Retrospective Claims Analysis.

Kim G, Hoyt M, Zakharyan A, Durica J, Wallem A, Viktrup L Adv Ther. 2024; 42(2):918-934.

PMID: 39680312 PMC: 11787261. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03072-9.