» Articles » PMID: 33869418

Observing the Unobservable: Migrant Selectivity and Agentic Individuality Among Higher Education Students in China and Europe

Overview
Journal Front Sociol
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2021 Apr 19
PMID 33869418
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The research in migrant selectivity largely overlooks the broader institutional processes that shape the extent to which migrants from different backgrounds are indeed positively selected. This is particularly true in the case of highly skilled migrants, whose selection may not be conditioned by migration but by education. This paper deals with this limitation by studying individual characteristics, which are often treated as unobserved selectivity, among a specific flow of educational migrants in Europe, namely, Chinese higher education students. To do so, we use a unique representative multi-country dataset of about 8,000 Chinese international students and their native-born counterparts in China, the UK, and Germany. Our evidence rules out positive selection of migrants on individuality traits such as ambition, creativity, or being a risk-taker or independently minded. This supports our argument that the prevalence of agentic models of individuality is embedded in tertiary education on a global level.

References
1.
Soysal Y . Citizenship, immigration, and the European social project: rights and obligations of individuality. Br J Sociol. 2012; 63(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01404.x. View

2.
Funk M, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Sturmer T, Brookhart M, Davidian M . Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173(7):761-7. PMC: 3070495. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq439. View

3.
van de Werfhorst H, Heath A . Selectivity of Migration and the Educational Disadvantages of Second-Generation Immigrants in Ten Host Societies. Eur J Popul. 2019; 35(2):347-378. PMC: 6497701. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-018-9484-2. View

4.
Linden A, Uysal S, Ryan A, Adams J . Estimating causal effects for multivalued treatments: a comparison of approaches. Stat Med. 2015; 35(4):534-52. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6768. View

5.
Karlson K . College as equalizer? Testing the selectivity hypothesis. Soc Sci Res. 2019; 80:216-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.001. View