» Articles » PMID: 21385832

Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effects

Overview
Journal Am J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Mar 10
PMID 21385832
Citations 309
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Doubly robust estimation combines a form of outcome regression with a model for the exposure (i.e., the propensity score) to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. When used individually to estimate a causal effect, both outcome regression and propensity score methods are unbiased only if the statistical model is correctly specified. The doubly robust estimator combines these 2 approaches such that only 1 of the 2 models need be correctly specified to obtain an unbiased effect estimator. In this introduction to doubly robust estimators, the authors present a conceptual overview of doubly robust estimation, a simple worked example, results from a simulation study examining performance of estimated and bootstrapped standard errors, and a discussion of the potential advantages and limitations of this method. The supplementary material for this paper, which is posted on the Journal's Web site (http://aje.oupjournals.org/), includes a demonstration of the doubly robust property (Web Appendix 1) and a description of a SAS macro (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) for doubly robust estimation, available for download at http://www.unc.edu/~mfunk/dr/.

Citing Articles

Job stress in a multinational corporation: cross-country comparison between Japan and Vietnam.

Chimed-Ochir O, Kubo T, Batsaikhan O, Yumiya Y, Mori K, Liu N Environ Occup Health Pract. 2025; 5(1).

PMID: 40059921 PMC: 11841804. DOI: 10.1539/eohp.2023-0009-OA.


Prognostic analysis of sepsis-induced myocardial injury patients using propensity score matching and doubly robust analysis with machine learning-based risk prediction model development.

Guo P, Xue L, Tao F, Yang K, Gao Y, Pei C Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1555103.

PMID: 40046920 PMC: 11880261. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1555103.


Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions and maternal and child nutrition outcomes in arid and semi-arid lands of Kenya.

Grant F, Amunga D, Mulwa C, Moyo M, Kwikiriza N, Malit J Front Nutr. 2025; 12:1465650.

PMID: 40041723 PMC: 11876023. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1465650.


Short- and long-term comparative effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in asthma patients: a cohort study.

Lin G, Wei Y, Guo Z, Wang H, Chan K, Chan R Respir Res. 2025; 26(1):75.

PMID: 40022135 PMC: 11871785. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-025-03156-2.


Does arts and cultural group participation influence subsequent well-being? A longitudinal cross-country comparison of older adults in Japan and England.

Bone J, Noguchi T, Mak H, Fancourt D, Kondo K, Saito T BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e000865.

PMID: 40018525 PMC: 11816965. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000865.


References
1.
Robins J . A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40 Suppl 2:139S-161S. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9681(87)80018-8. View

2.
Sturmer T, Rothman K, Glynn R . Insights into different results from different causal contrasts in the presence of effect-measure modification. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006; 15(10):698-709. PMC: 1581494. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1231. View

3.
Cole S, Frangakis C . The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?. Epidemiology. 2009; 20(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818ef366. View

4.
Westreich D, Lessler J, Funk M . Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(8):826-33. PMC: 2907172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.020. View

5.
van der Laan M . Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I. Int J Biostat. 2011; 6(2):Article 2. PMC: 3126670. View