Update on All-arthroscopic Vs. Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: To provide an updated comparison between modern arthroscopic and mini-open repairs for treating rotator cuff tears.
Methods: Multiple online databases were searched from 2010 to October 1st, 2020. A meta-analysis was conducted for patient-reported outcomes and complications.
Results: Eleven studies were included. Majority of patients underwent mini-open repair (MOR) compared to arthroscopic repair (AR) (57.4% vs 42.6%). A meta-analysis found statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in patient-reported outcomes favouring AR. While retear rates were higher in AR (p = 0.03) analysis of retear rates for arthroscopic double row and mini-open repairs, yielded no differences between groups (p = 0.48).
Conclusion: Patients undergoing AR for rotator cuff tears had improved post-operative clinical outcomes in some functional outcomes compared to MOR. Modern arthroscopic double row repair result in similar failure rates to open repair techniques.
Level Of Evidence: Level III, Systematic Review of Level I-III studies.
Surgical Interventions for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Aden A, Alsayeh S, Aburas L, Masood Q Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75606.
PMID: 39803006 PMC: 11724712. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75606.
Megalla M, Hahn A, Bauer J, Windsor J, Grace Z, Gedman M Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(5):100963.
PMID: 39534040 PMC: 11551354. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100963.
Liu S, Bramian A, Loyst R, Ling K, Leonardo C, Komatsu D Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65673.
PMID: 39205747 PMC: 11355486. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65673.
Understanding Fibrous Tissue in the Effective Healing of Rotator Cuff Injury.
Rajalekshmi R, Agrawal D J Surg Res (Houst). 2024; 7(2):215-228.
PMID: 38872898 PMC: 11174978. DOI: 10.26502/jsr.10020363.
Dannaway J, Sharma G, Raniga S, Graham P, Bokor D JSES Int. 2024; 8(1):47-52.
PMID: 38312295 PMC: 10837722. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.09.006.