» Articles » PMID: 30343477

Evaluation of Long-term Postoperative Outcomes Between Mini-open and Arthroscopic Repair for Isolated Supraspinatus Tears: a Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 22
PMID 30343477
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is an increasingly popular procedure, the mini-open (MO) repair still remains a viable and appreciated technique. The purpose of the study was to analyze the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with isolated supraspinatus tear undergoing MO or arthroscopic surgery (AS) repair.

Patients And Methods: Forty-six patients underwent supraspinatus repair with anchors: 24 with MO technique and 22 with AS procedure. They were evaluated postoperatively at 3, 6, 12 months and 2 years.

Results: The mean surgery time, the mean hospital stay and the average costs were shorter in the MO patients respect to the AS group. Despite an initial better Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Constant Murley Score in the first 6 months of follow-up in the AS group, no differences were detected at 24 months.

Conclusion: This study suggests that isolated supraspinatus tears can be treated with a MO or arthroscopic repair procedure with similar clinical outcome in the long-term postoperative period. The mean surgery time and the average costs are less in the MO group respect to the AS group.

Citing Articles

Rotator Cuff Repair by All-Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Technique: A Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcome.

Daga S, Baid M, Sarkar P, Das A, Hemant Shah R, Dhandapani K Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71546.

PMID: 39544574 PMC: 11563191. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71546.


Comparison of clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: An observational study.

Tosyali H, Kaya H, Hancioglu S, Tamsel I, Orguc S, Tekustun F Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(22):e38181.

PMID: 39259080 PMC: 11142816. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038181.


Role of biomechanical assessment in rotator cuff tear repair: Arthroscopic mini-open approach.

Solarino G, Bortone I, Vicenti G, Bizzoca D, Coviello M, Maccagnano G World J Orthop. 2022; 12(12):991-1000.

PMID: 35036341 PMC: 8696602. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.991.


Update on all-arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sakha S, Erdogan S, Shanmugaraj A, Betsch M, Leroux T, Khan M J Orthop. 2021; 24:254-263.

PMID: 33867750 PMC: 8040116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.03.009.

References
1.
Verdano M, Pellegrini A, Scita G, Costantino C, Ceccarelli F . Arthroscopic treatment for cuff tear: strength recovery at 12 months of follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013; 97(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-013-0241-8. View

2.
Patte D . Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (254):81-6. View

3.
Ghodadra N, Provencher M, Verma N, Wilk K, Romeo A . Open, mini-open, and all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: indications and implications for rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(2):81-9. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2918. View

4.
Liu J, Fan L, Zhu Y, Yu H, Xu T, Li G . Comparison of clinical outcomes in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of rotator cuff tears: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(11):e6322. PMC: 5369905. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006322. View

5.
Churchill R, Ghorai J . Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(5):716-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.011. View