» Articles » PMID: 33866085

Intersectionality in Quantitative Health Disparities Research: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Limitations in Empirical Studies

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2021 Apr 18
PMID 33866085
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Quantitative health disparities research has increasingly employed intersectionality as a theoretical tool to investigate how social characteristics intersect to generate health inequality. Yet, intersectionality was not designed to quantify, predict, or identify health disparities, and, as a result, multiple criticisms against its misapplication in health disparities research have been made. As such, there is an emerging need to evaluate the growing body of quantitative research that aims to investigate health disparities through an intersectional lens.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review from earliest records to January 2020 to (i) describe the scope of limitations when applying intersectionality to quantitative health disparities research, and (ii) identify recommendations to improve the future integration of intersectionality with this scholarship. We identified relevant publications with electronic searches in PubMed and CA Web of Science. Studies eligible for inclusion were English-language publications that used quantitative methodologies to investigate health disparities among adults in the U.S. while explicitly claiming to adopt an intersectional perspective. Out of 1279 articles reviewed, 65 were eligible for inclusion.

Results: Our review found that, while the value of intersectionality to the study of health disparities is evident, the existing research struggles with meeting intersectionality's fundamental assumptions. In particular, four limitations were found to be widespread: narrowing the measurements of intersectionality, intersectional groups, and health outcomes; placing primacy on the study of certain intersectional groups to the neglect of others; overlooking underlying explanatory mechanisms that contribute to the health disparities experienced by intersectional groups; and, lacking in the use of life-course perspectives to show how health disparities vary across different life stages.

Conclusion: If the goal of health equality is to be achieved among diverse intersectional groups, future research must be assisted by the collection and examination of data that overcomes these limitations.

Citing Articles

Sex Differences in Cigarette Smoking Among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black All of Us Participants: The Relative Importance of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health.

Espinosa A, Ruglass L, Conway F, Pattanshetti S, Ostroff J, Sheffer C J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025; .

PMID: 40053216 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-025-02349-1.


The relationships between race, employment, and self-rated health among older South Africans: exploring the mediating role of generalized anxiety.

Yunus A, Zhou L, Jamatutu S, Tackie E Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1398705.

PMID: 39635210 PMC: 11614727. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398705.


Intersectional inequalities in mental health by education, income, gender, and age before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study.

Verra S, Evans C, Groeniger J, de Wit J, Poelman M, Kamphuis C Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):250.

PMID: 39587583 PMC: 11590372. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02338-6.


Quantitative Intersectionality Scoring System (QISS): Opportunities for Enhancing Predictive Modeling, Comparative Analysis, Health Needs Assessment, and Policy Evaluation.

Assari S, Zare H J Soc Math Hum Eng Sci. 2024; 3(1):49-61.

PMID: 39544223 PMC: 11563457. DOI: 10.31586/jsmhes.2024.1066.


Sociodemographic differences in low back pain: which subgroups of workers are most vulnerable?.

Beller J, Sperlich S, Epping J, Safieddine B, Hegewald J, Tetzlaff J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):852.

PMID: 39462332 PMC: 11515217. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07970-5.


References
1.
Denise E . Multiple disadvantaged statuses and health: the role of multiple forms of discrimination. J Health Soc Behav. 2014; 55(1):3-19. DOI: 10.1177/0022146514521215. View

2.
Green M, Evans C, Subramanian S . Can intersectionality theory enrich population health research?. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 178:214-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.029. View

3.
Earnshaw V, Smith L, Chaudoir S, Amico K, Copenhaver M . HIV stigma mechanisms and well-being among PLWH: a test of the HIV stigma framework. AIDS Behav. 2013; 17(5):1785-95. PMC: 3664141. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-013-0437-9. View

4.
McClendon J, Jackson J, Bogdan R, Oltmanns T . Trajectories of racial and gender health disparities during later midlife: Connections to personality. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2018; 25(3):359-370. PMC: 6557706. DOI: 10.1037/cdp0000238. View

5.
Liu H, Reczek C, Mindes S, Shen S . The Health Disparities of Same-Sex Cohabitors at the Intersection of Race-Ethnicity and Gender. Sociol Perspect. 2017; 60(3):620-639. PMC: 5419686. DOI: 10.1177/0731121416663685. View