» Articles » PMID: 31805907

The Coin Model of Privilege and Critical Allyship: Implications for Health

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Dec 7
PMID 31805907
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Health inequities are widespread and persistent, and the root causes are social, political and economic as opposed to exclusively behavioural or genetic. A barrier to transformative change is the tendency to frame these inequities as unfair consequences of social structures that result in disadvantage, without also considering how these same structures give unearned advantage, or privilege, to others. Eclipsing privilege in discussions of health equity is a crucial shortcoming, because how one frames the problem sets the range of possible solutions that will follow. If inequity is framed exclusively as a problem facing people who are disadvantaged, then responses will only ever target the needs of these groups without redressing the social structures causing disadvantages. Furthermore, responses will ignore the complicity of the corollary groups who receive unearned and unfair advantage from these same structures. In other words, we are missing the bigger picture. In this conceptualization of health inequity, we have limited the potential for disruptive action to end these enduring patterns.The goal of this article is to advance understanding and action on health inequities and the social determinants of health by introducing a framework for transformative change: the Coin Model of Privilege and Critical Allyship. First, I introduce the model, which explains how social structures produce both unearned advantage and disadvantage. The model embraces an intersectional approach to understand how systems of inequality, such as sexism, racism and ableism, interact with each other to produce complex patterns of privilege and oppression. Second, I describe principles for practicing critical allyship to guide the actions of people in positions of privilege for resisting the unjust structures that produce health inequities. The article is a call to action for all working in health to (1) recognize their positions of privilege, and (2) use this understanding to reorient their approach from saving unfortunate people to working in solidarity and collective action on systems of inequality.

Citing Articles

Conference on implementation of anti-oppressive practice into primary care: Activity report.

Mizumoto J, Sano K, Ando T, Yumino A, Haseda M, Iizuka G J Gen Fam Med. 2025; 26(2):187-188.

PMID: 40061397 PMC: 11890040. DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.751.


PEARLS debriefing for social justice and equity: integrating health advocacy in simulation-based education.

Soilis N, Kinsella E, Eppich W, Cheng A, Beavers L, Bhanji F Adv Simul (Lond). 2024; 9(1):47.

PMID: 39696521 PMC: 11658125. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00320-4.


Setting the balance of care for older adults at risk of hospitalization and delayed discharge: A mixed-methods research protocol.

Kuluski K, Jacobson D, Ghazalbash S, Baek J, Rosella L, Mansfield E PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315918.

PMID: 39689096 PMC: 11651538. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315918.


Fishing with skis, digging with noodles: Resolving task-and-tool mismatches in efforts to advance health equity.

Plamondon K, Shahram S Dialogues Health. 2024; 5:100200.

PMID: 39687587 PMC: 11647146. DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100200.


Researchers' agency and the boundaries of global mental health: perspectives from and about Latin America.

Montenegro C, Abarca-Brown G, Flores E, Susser E, Rivera E, Paniagua-Avila A BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(12).

PMID: 39663126 PMC: 11647327. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015923.


References
1.
Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H . Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem?. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 42(4):617-24. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00335-5. View

2.
Happell B, Scholz B, Gordon S, Bocking J, Ellis P, Roper C . "I don't think we've quite got there yet": The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018; 25(8):453-462. DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12476. View

3.
Meyer I . Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(5):674-697. PMC: 2072932. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. View

4.
Simons D . Monkeying around with the gorillas in our midst: familiarity with an inattentional-blindness task does not improve the detection of unexpected events. Iperception. 2013; 1(1):3-6. PMC: 3563049. DOI: 10.1068/i0386. View

5.
Emerson E, Madden R, Graham H, Llewellyn G, Hatton C, Robertson J . The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health. Public Health. 2011; 125(3):145-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.11.003. View