» Articles » PMID: 33863306

Birth Companionship in a Government Health System: a Pilot Study in Kigoma, Tanzania

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Apr 17
PMID 33863306
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Having a companion of choice throughout childbirth is an important component of good quality and respectful maternity care for women and has become standard in many countries. However, there are only a few examples of birth companionship being implemented in government health systems in low-income countries. To learn if birth companionship was feasible, acceptable and led to improved quality of care in these settings, we implemented a pilot project using 9 intervention and 6 comparison sites (all government health facilities) in a rural region of Tanzania.

Methods: The pilot was developed and implemented in Kigoma, Tanzania between July 2016 and December 2018. Women delivering at intervention sites were given the choice of having a birth companion with them during childbirth. We evaluated the pilot with: (a) project data; (b) focus group discussions; (c) structured and semi-structured interviews; and (d) service statistics.

Results: More than 80% of women delivering at intervention sites had a birth companion who provided support during childbirth, including comforting women and staying by their side. Most women interviewed at intervention sites were very satisfied with having a companion during childbirth (96-99%). Most women at the intervention sites also reported that the presence of a companion improved their labor, delivery and postpartum experience (82-97%). Health providers also found companions very helpful because they assisted with their workload, alerted the provider about changes in the woman's status, and provided emotional support to the woman. When comparing intervention and comparison sites, providers at intervention sites were significantly more likely to: respond to women who called for help (p = 0.003), interact in a friendly way (p < 0.001), greet women respectfully (p < 0.001), and try to make them more comfortable (p = 0.003). Higher proportions of women who gave birth at intervention sites reported being "very satisfied" with the care they received (p < 0.001), and that the staff were "very kind" (p < 0.001) and "very encouraging" (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Birth companionship was feasible and well accepted by health providers, government officials and most importantly, women who delivered at intervention facilities. The introduction of birth companionship improved women's experience of birth and the maternity ward environment overall.

Citing Articles

Introducing and establishing birth companionship in labour ward of a tertiary care centre in North India: a quality improvement journey through and beyond COVID-19 pandemic.

Singh M, Puri M, Bessy S, Ranvir Singh G, George S, Singh A BMJ Open Qual. 2025; 13(Suppl 1).

PMID: 39863297 PMC: 11789543. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002294.


"If my husband was in the labor ward with me, my baby wouldn't have died"; experiences on birth companionship from a tertiary health facility, Tanzania.

Mwakyusa M, Said A, Selemani S, Kakiziba M, Christopher J, Sirili N PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0309602.

PMID: 39787258 PMC: 11717287. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309602.


An investigation into the acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, and fidelity of implementation strategies for birth companionship in Tehran: a qualitative inquiry on mitigating mistreatment of women during childbirth.

Mirzania M, Shakibazadeh E, Hantoushzadeh S, Panahi Z, Bohren M, Khajavi A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1292.

PMID: 38741128 PMC: 11089689. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18751-z.


Exploring Healthcare Providers' and Women's Perspectives of Labor Companionship during Childbirth: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Study.

AlKhunaizi A, Al-Otaibi A, Alharbi M, Bahari G Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 38727426 PMC: 11083292. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12090869.


Exploring women's experiences of care during hospital childbirth in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study.

Metta E, Unkels R, Mselle L, Hanson C, Alvesson H, Alwy Al-Beity F BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):290.

PMID: 38641769 PMC: 11027221. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06396-0.


References
1.
Bohren M, Hunter E, Munthe-Kaas H, Souza J, Vogel J, Gulmezoglu A . Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014; 11(1):71. PMC: 4247708. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71. View

2.
Kruk M, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman L . Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2018; 33(1):e26-e33. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu079. View

3.
Bohren M, Berger B, Munthe-Kaas H, Tuncalp O . Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 3:CD012449. PMC: 6422112. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2. View

4.
Freedman L, Kujawski S, Mbuyita S, Kuwawenaruwa A, Kruk M, Ramsey K . Eye of the beholder? Observation versus self-report in the measurement of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Reprod Health Matters. 2018; 26(53):107-122. DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1502024. View

5.
Mselle L, Kohi T, Dol J . Barriers and facilitators to humanizing birth care in Tanzania: findings from semi-structured interviews with midwives and obstetricians. Reprod Health. 2018; 15(1):137. PMC: 6092851. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0583-7. View