» Articles » PMID: 33861776

Validation of a New Wearable Device for Type 3 Sleep Test Without Flowmeter

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Apr 16
PMID 33861776
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ventilation monitoring during sleep is performed by sleep test instrumentation that is uncomfortable for the patients due to the presence of the flowmeter. The objective of this study was to evaluate if an innovative type 3 wearable system, the X10X and X10Y, is able to correctly detect events of apnea and hypopnea and to classify the severity of sleep apnea without the use of a flowmeter.

Methods: 40 patients with sleep disordered breathing were analyzed by continuous and simultaneous recording of X10X and X10Y and another certified type 3 system, SOMNOtouch, used for comparison. Evaluation was performed in terms of quality of respiratory signals (scores from 1, lowest, to 5, highest), duration and classification of apneas, as well as identification and duration of hypopneas.

Results: 580 periods were evaluated. Mean quality assigned score was 3.37±1.42 and 3.25±1.35 for X10X and X10Y and SOMNOtouch, respectively. The agreement between the two systems was evaluated with grades 4 and 5 in 383 out of 580 cases. A high correlation (r2 = 0.921; p<0.001) was found between the AHI indexes obtained from the two systems. X10X and X10Y devices were able to correctly classify 72.3% of the obstructive apneas, 81% of the central apneas, 61.3% of the hypopneas, and 64.6% of the mixed apneas when compared to SOMNOtouch device.

Conclusion: The X10X and X10Y devices are able to provide a correct grading of sleep respiratory disorders without the need of a nasal cannula for respiratory flow measurement and can be considered as a type 3 sleep test device for screening tests.

Citing Articles

Influence of Photoplethysmogram Signal Quality on Pulse Arrival Time during Polysomnography.

Rinkevicius M, Charlton P, Bailon R, Marozas V Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(4.

PMID: 36850820 PMC: 9967654. DOI: 10.3390/s23042220.


Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness.

Canali S, Schiaffonati V, Aliverti A PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 1(10):e0000104.

PMID: 36812619 PMC: 9931360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000104.


Blood Pressure Continuous Measurement through a Wearable Device: Development and Validation of a Cuffless Method.

de Marchi B, Frigerio M, De Nadai S, Longinotti-Buitoni G, Aliverti A Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(21).

PMID: 34770641 PMC: 8588523. DOI: 10.3390/s21217334.

References
1.
Berry R, Brooks R, Gamaldo C, Harding S, Lloyd R, Quan S . AASM Scoring Manual Updates for 2017 (Version 2.4). J Clin Sleep Med. 2017; 13(5):665-666. PMC: 5406946. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6576. View

2.
Gami A, Pressman G, Caples S, Kanagala R, Gard J, Davison D . Association of atrial fibrillation and obstructive sleep apnea. Circulation. 2004; 110(4):364-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000136587.68725.8E. View

3.
Yin M, Miyazaki S, Ishikawa K . Evaluation of type 3 portable monitoring in unattended home setting for suspected sleep apnea: factors that may affect its accuracy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 134(2):204-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.019. View

4.
Vogiatzis I . The wireless revolution and cardiorespiratory system monitoring. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 284:81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.036. View

5.
Polese J, Santos-Silva R, Ferrari P, Sartori D, Tufik S, Bittencourt L . Is portable monitoring for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea syndrome suitable in elderly population?. Sleep Breath. 2012; 17(2):679-86. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-012-0742-y. View