» Articles » PMID: 33860143

Impact of Subdivision of Pathological Stage I Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 16
PMID 33860143
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Stage II-IV colorectal cancers are subdivided according to TNM categories. However, stage I cases are a single category, despite the inclusion of both T1 and T2 cases, which may have different outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of subdividing stage I colorectal cancers by T category.

Methods: From 1984 to 2015, 844 patients with stage I colorectal cancer (T1: 446, T2: 398) underwent colorectal resection with lymph node dissection at three hospitals. The long-term survival and recurrence rates were compared between T1 and T2. A Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with cancer recurrence.

Results: A comparison of the T1 and T2 groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall (95.9% vs 91.4%,  = .008), recurrence-free (94.8% vs 87.1%,  = .0007), and cancer-specific survival (97.6% vs 93.6%,  = .004), and in the overall (2.5% vs 6.8%,  = .003), local (0.2% vs 1.5%,  = .04), and lymph node recurrence rates (0.2% vs 1.5%,  = .04). All local and lymph node recurrences were associated with lower rectal cancer, and this difference was significant. The Cox multivariate analysis identified male sex ( = .01, hazard ratio: 4.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-11.55), T2 ( = .02, hazard ratio: 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-7.60), and venous invasion ( = .03, hazard ratio: 2.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-5.10) as risk factors for recurrence.

Conclusions: The subdivision of stage I colorectal cancer according to T category clearly reflected the long-term outcomes.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer after curative resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hwang S, Shin S, Kim Y, Lee J Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025; 108(1):39-48.

PMID: 39823035 PMC: 11735171. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.1.39.


Impact of subdivision of pathological stage I colorectal cancer.

Fujii S, Shimada R, Tsukamoto M, Hayama T, Ishibe A, Watanabe J Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021; 5(2):228-235.

PMID: 33860143 PMC: 8034690. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12407.

References
1.
Okamura R, Hida K, Nishizaki D, Sugihara K, Sakai Y . Proposal of a stage-specific surveillance strategy for colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of Japanese large cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44(4):449-455. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.080. View

2.
Jannasch O, Klinge T, Otto R, Chiapponi C, Udelnow A, Lippert H . Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015; 6(34):36884-93. PMC: 4742217. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5170. View

3.
Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T . Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019; 25(1):1-42. PMC: 6946738. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z. View

4.
Nam M, Han K, Kim B, Hong C, Sohn D, Chang H . Long-term outcomes of locally or radically resected T1 colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 18(9):852-60. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13221. View

5.
Knijn N, Mogk S, Teerenstra S, Simmer F, Nagtegaal I . Perineural Invasion is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015; 40(1):103-12. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000518. View