» Articles » PMID: 33843543

Dietary Inflammatory Index and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 12
PMID 33843543
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The meta-analysis was conducted to test the link between pancreatic cancer (PC) risk and dietary inflammatory index (DII®) score.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 22 November 2020 to identify the relevant studies. Studies that reported the risk estimates and the corresponding 95 % CI for the DII category and PC risk were included. The effect sizes were pooled using the random-effects model. Dose-response analysis was conducted where possible.

Participants: Two prospective cohort studies of 634 705 participants (3152 incident cases), and four case-control studies of 2737 cases and 4861 controls.

Results: Overall, the pooled risk ratio (RR) indicated that individuals in the highest category compared with the lowest category had an increased PC risk (RR = 1·45; 95 % CI 1·11, 1·90; P = 0·006). Meanwhile, significant heterogeneity was also revealed. The dose-response meta-analysis indicated that a 1-unit increase in the DII score was associated with the PC risk (RR = 1·08; 95 % CI 1·002, 1·166; P = 0·045; I2 = 94·1 %, P < 0·001). Nonlinear result showed an increased risk of moving from fewer to more inflammatory borders with increasing DII score (Pnonlinearity = 0·003; I2 = 76·5 %, P < 0·001). Subgroup analyses found that significant positive association between PC risk and DII score appeared to be in case-control studies (RR = 1·70; 95 % CI 1·16, 2·50; P = 0·007) and studies with ≤ 31 DII components (RR = 1·76; 95 % CI 1·14, 2·72; P = 0·011).

Conclusion: These findings suggested dietary habits with high inflammatory features (high DII score) might increase PC risk.

Citing Articles

The Impact of the Dietary Inflammatory Index, Fasting Blood Glucose, and Smoking Status on the Incidence and Survival of Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Case-Control Study and a Prospective Study.

Lee G, Kim Y, Woo S, Lee W, Han S, Park S Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599726 PMC: 11597200. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223941.


B3GNT5 is a novel marker correlated with malignant phenotype and poor outcome in pancreatic cancer.

Yao W, Wang Y, Zhang X, Lin Y iScience. 2024; 27(10):110889.

PMID: 39319269 PMC: 11421285. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110889.


Pro-Inflammatory Food, Gut Microbiota, and Cardiovascular and Pancreatic Diseases.

Chen B, Patel S, Bao L, Nadeem D, Krittanawong C Biomolecules. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38397447 PMC: 10886602. DOI: 10.3390/biom14020210.


Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Nutrition: Exploring the Role of Diet and Gut Health.

Gualtieri P, Cianci R, Frank G, Pizzocaro E, De Santis G, Giannattasio S Nutrients. 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37892540 PMC: 10610120. DOI: 10.3390/nu15204465.


The relationship between dietary inflammatory potential and cancer outcomes among cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Han E, Lee E, Sukhu B, Garcia J, Lopez Castillo H Transl Oncol. 2023; 38:101798.

PMID: 37826918 PMC: 10582578. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101798.


References
1.
Koyanagi Y, Matsuo K, Ito H, Tamakoshi A, Sugawara Y, Hidaka A . Body-Mass Index and Pancreatic Cancer Incidence: A Pooled Analysis of Nine Population-Based Cohort Studies With More Than 340,000 Japanese Subjects. J Epidemiol. 2017; 28(5):245-252. PMC: 5911675. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20160193. View

2.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21590. View

3.
Jiao L, Chen L, White D, Tinker L, Chlebowski R, van Horn L . Low-fat Dietary Pattern and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 110(1). PMC: 6059156. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx117. View

4.
Ratnam N, Peterson J, Talbert E, Ladner K, Rajasekera P, Schmidt C . NF-κB regulates GDF-15 to suppress macrophage surveillance during early tumor development. J Clin Invest. 2017; 127(10):3796-3809. PMC: 5617672. DOI: 10.1172/JCI91561. View

5.
Desquilbet L, Mariotti F . Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med. 2010; 29(9):1037-57. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3841. View