» Articles » PMID: 33841753

Prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 Single Guide RNA Cleavage Efficiency and Specificity by Attention-based Convolutional Neural Networks

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Apr 12
PMID 33841753
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is a preferred genome editing tool and has been widely adapted to ranges of disciplines, from molecular biology to gene therapy. A key prerequisite for the success of CRISPR/Cas9 is its capacity to distinguish between single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) on target and homologous off-target sites. Thus, optimized design of sgRNAs by maximizing their on-target activity and minimizing their potential off-target mutations are crucial concerns for this system. Several deep learning models have been developed for comprehensive understanding of sgRNA cleavage efficacy and specificity. Although the proposed methods yield the performance results by automatically learning a suitable representation from the input data, there is still room for the improvement of accuracy and interpretability. Here, we propose novel interpretable attention-based convolutional neural networks, namely CRISPR-ONT and CRISPR-OFFT, for the prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA on- and off-target activities, respectively. Experimental tests on public datasets demonstrate that our models significantly yield satisfactory results in terms of accuracy and interpretability. Our findings contribute to the understanding of how RNA-guide Cas9 nucleases scan the mammalian genome. Data and source codes are available at https://github.com/Peppags/CRISPRont-CRISPRofft.

Citing Articles

Gene therapy for genetic diseases: challenges and future directions.

Qie B, Tuo J, Chen F, Ding H, Lyu L MedComm (2020). 2025; 6(2):e70091.

PMID: 39949979 PMC: 11822459. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70091.


Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.

Abbasi A, Asim M, Dengel A J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):153.

PMID: 39905452 PMC: 11796103. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06013-w.


DeepMEns: an ensemble model for predicting sgRNA on-target activity based on multiple features.

Ding S, Zheng J, Jia C Brief Funct Genomics. 2024; 24.

PMID: 39528429 PMC: 11735754. DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elae043.


The Evolution of Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnosis Methods from the (pre-)CRISPR to CRISPR era and the Associated Machine/Deep Learning Approaches in Relevant RNA Design.

Chakraborty S, Ray Dutta J, Ganesan R, Minary P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2847:241-300.

PMID: 39312149 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4079-1_17.


Overcoming CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction hurdles: A novel approach with ESB rebalancing strategy and CRISPR-MCA model.

Yang Y, Zheng Y, Zou Q, Li J, Feng H PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(9):e1012340.

PMID: 39226304 PMC: 11398643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012340.


References
1.
Kim H, Kim Y, Lee S, Min S, Bae J, Choi J . SpCas9 activity prediction by DeepSpCas9, a deep learning-based model with high generalization performance. Sci Adv. 2019; 5(11):eaax9249. PMC: 6834390. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax9249. View

2.
Haeussler M, Schonig K, Eckert H, Eschstruth A, Mianne J, Renaud J . Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016; 17(1):148. PMC: 4934014. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2. View

3.
Ran F, Cong L, Yan W, Scott D, Gootenberg J, Kriz A . In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature. 2015; 520(7546):186-91. PMC: 4393360. DOI: 10.1038/nature14299. View

4.
Listgarten J, Weinstein M, Kleinstiver B, Sousa A, Joung J, Crawford J . Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018; 2(1):38-47. PMC: 6037314. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0178-6. View

5.
Tsai S, Zheng Z, Nguyen N, Liebers M, Topkar V, Thapar V . GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 33(2):187-197. PMC: 4320685. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3117. View