Novel Approach to Risk Stratification in Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Using A Combined Cardiac Imaging and Plasma Biomarker Approach
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background Left ventricular non-compaction remains a poorly described entity, which has led to challenges of overdiagnosis. We aimed to evaluate if the presence of a thin compacted myocardial layer portends poorer outcomes in individuals meeting cardiac magnetic resonance criteria for left ventricular non-compaction . Methods and Results This was an observational, retrospective cohort study involving individuals selected from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation cardiac magnetic resonance database (N=26 531). Between 2000 and 2018, 328 individuals ≥12 years, with left ventricular non-compaction or excessive trabeculations based on the cardiac magnetic resonance Petersen criteria were included. The cohort comprised 42% women, mean age 43 years. We assessed the predictive ability of myocardial thinning for the primary composite end point of major adverse cardiac events (composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular assist device implantation/heart transplant, ventricular tachycardia, or ischemic stroke). At mean follow-up of 3.1 years, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 102 (31%) patients. After adjusting for comorbidities, the risk of major adverse cardiac events was nearly doubled in the presence of significant compacted myocardial thinning (hazard ratio [HR], 1.88 [95% CI, 1.18‒3.00]; =0.016), tripled in the presence of elevated plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (HR, 3.29 [95% CI, 1.52‒7.11]; =0.006), and increased by 5% for every 10-unit increase in left ventricular end-systolic volume (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00‒1.01]; =0.041). Conclusions The risk of adverse clinical events is increased in the presence of significant compacted myocardial thinning, an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide or increased left ventricular dimensions. The combination of these markers may enhance risk assessment to minimize left ventricular non-compaction overdiagnosis whilst facilitating appropriate diagnoses in those with true disease.
Han P, Jiang Z, Gu R, Huang S, Jiang Y, Yang Z Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(10):6468-6481.
PMID: 37869344 PMC: 10585548. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-372.
Ma Y, Wang L, Zhao X, Zheng Y, Sha L, Zhao X Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 29(5):682-690.
PMID: 36995015 PMC: 10679546. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.221859.
Polacin M, Karolyi M, Wilzeck V, Eberhard M, Gotschy A, Alkadhi H Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023; 4(6):e220109.
PMID: 36601458 PMC: 9806726. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.220109.
Certainties and Uncertainties of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Athletes.
Szabo L, Brunetti G, Cipriani A, Juhasz V, Graziano F, Hirschberg K J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022; 9(10).
PMID: 36286312 PMC: 9604894. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100361.
Machine learning techniques for arrhythmic risk stratification: a review of the literature.
Chung C, Bazoukis G, Lee S, Liu Y, Liu T, Letsas K Int J Arrhythmia. 2022; 23.
PMID: 35449883 PMC: 9020640. DOI: 10.1186/s42444-022-00062-2.