» Articles » PMID: 33824904

Development and Pilot Test of ComCare - a Questionnaire for Quick Assessment of Communicative and Social Competences in Medical Students After Interviews with Simulated Patients

Overview
Journal GMS J Med Educ
Date 2021 Apr 7
PMID 33824904
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Physicians' communicative and social competences are highly relevant for doctor-patient relationships. Simulation-based learning is frequently used to provide students with learning experiences resembling realistic medical situations. This study aims to assess communication and interpersonal skills in medical students after simulated consultations with a newly designed short questionnaire. In 2019, 103 final year students participated in a simulated consultation hour seeing four simulated patients. Communicative and social competences were assessed by a questionnaire including items for communication (Com) and interpersonal (Care) skills. The questionnaire was used by the simulated patients (ComCareP) after each consultation and as self-assessment by the students (ComCareD) after the fourth consultation. An explorative factor analysis was performed and the results of ComCareP and ComCareD were compared with respect to students' sex and advancement in their final year. All ComCareP items loaded on one factor, which explained 50.7% of the variance. The participants self-assessed their communication and interpersonal skills significantly better than the simulated patients. No significant differences were found for students' sexes or advancement in their final year except for the item "responding to patients' needs satisfactorily" which was significantly lower in students at the end of their final year. Patients' general "satisfaction with the consultation" was higher while physicians' general "satisfaction with the consultation" was lower than their total ComCare mean score. The general satisfaction with the consultation showed a significant positive correlation with both ComCares' total mean scores. The ComCare measures communication and interpersonal skills as one factor. It can be used directly after consultations and shows significant positive correlation with the general satisfaction with a consultation. Since simulated patients' satisfaction with the consultation was higher than their ComCare score, other factors than communication and interpersonal skills could play a role for patient satisfaction with a conversation and need to be further investigated.

Citing Articles

Physicians' Social Skills - Conceptualization, Taxonomy, and Behavioral Assessment.

Breil S, Amelung D, Oberst S, Rollinger T, Ahrens H, Garbe A Perspect Med Educ. 2024; 13(1):635-645.

PMID: 39735823 PMC: 11673732. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1171.


"Fit for the finals" - project report on a telemedical training with simulated patients, peers, and assessors for the licensing exam.

Harendza S, Bussenius L, Gartner J, Heuser M, Ahles J, Prediger S GMS J Med Educ. 2023; 40(2):Doc17.

PMID: 37361248 PMC: 10285374. DOI: 10.3205/zma001599.


Comparison of student self-assessment and teacher assessment of medical interview performance during bedside learning.

Tang Z, Shikama Y, Otani K Fukushima J Med Sci. 2023; 69(1):21-28.

PMID: 36990787 PMC: 10122972. DOI: 10.5387/fms.2023-03.


Re: Evaluation of a telemedicine-based training for final-year medical students including simulated patient consultations, documentation, and case presentation.

Harendza S GMS J Med Educ. 2021; 38(7):Doc113.

PMID: 34957318 PMC: 8675383. DOI: 10.3205/zma001509.


Perspective matters: assessment of medical students' communication and interpersonal skills by simulated patients from the internal and external patient perspective.

Prediger S, Harendza S GMS J Med Educ. 2021; 38(4):Doc82.

PMID: 34056071 PMC: 8136342. DOI: 10.3205/zma001478.


References
1.
Nestel D, Groom J, Eikeland-Husebo S, ODonnell J . Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science. Simul Healthc. 2011; 6 Suppl:S10-3. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227ce96. View

2.
Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y . What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(2):e13830. PMC: 7055794. DOI: 10.2196/13830. View

3.
Nestel D, Tierney T . Role-play for medical students learning about communication: guidelines for maximising benefits. BMC Med Educ. 2007; 7:3. PMC: 1828731. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-3. View

4.
Zandbelt L, Smets E, Oort F, Godfried M, de Haes H . Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19(11):1088-95. PMC: 1494792. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30420.x. View

5.
Janssen S, Lagro-Janssen A . Physician's gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 89(2):221-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.034. View