» Articles » PMID: 33824412

Graphomotor Memory in Exner's Area Enhances Word Learning in the Blind

Overview
Journal Commun Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Apr 7
PMID 33824412
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Handwriting is thought to impede vocabulary learning in sighted adults because the motor execution of writing interferes with efficient audiovisual processing during encoding. However, the motor memory of writing may facilitate adult word learning when visual sensory inputs are severely restricted. Using functional MRI, we show that late-blind participants, but not sighted participants, learned novel words by recruiting the left dorsal premotor cortex known as Exner's writing area and its functional coupling with the left hippocampus. During later recall, the phonological and semantic contents of these words are represented in the activation patterns of the left hippocampus as well as in those of left frontotemporal language areas. These findings suggest that motor codes of handwriting help blind participants maintain word-form representations during learning and retrieval. We propose that such reliance on the motor system reflects a broad architecture of the cerebral language network which encompasses the limb motor system as a hardwired component.

Citing Articles

Neural representation of sensorimotor features in language-motor areas during auditory and visual perception.

Zheng Y, Zhang J, Yang Y, Xu M Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):41.

PMID: 39799186 PMC: 11724955. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07466-5.


Stroke disconnectome decodes reading networks.

Forkel S, Labache L, Nachev P, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Hesling I Brain Struct Funct. 2022; 227(9):2897-2908.

PMID: 36192557 PMC: 9653326. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-022-02575-x.


Facilitative Effects of Embodied English Instruction in Chinese Children.

Guan C, Meng W Front Psychol. 2022; 13:915952.

PMID: 35911001 PMC: 9331189. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915952.

References
1.
Pashler H . Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994; 116(2):220-44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220. View

2.
Dehaene S, Cohen L, Sigman M, Vinckier F . The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(7):335-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004. View

3.
Colenbrander D, Miles K, Ricketts J . To See or Not to See: How Does Seeing Spellings Support Vocabulary Learning?. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019; 50(4):609-628. DOI: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-VOIA-18-0135. View

4.
Rodriguez-Fornells A, Cunillera T, Mestres-Misse A, de Diego-Balaguer R . Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in language learning in adults. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1536):3711-35. PMC: 2846313. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0130. View

5.
Jackendoff . Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999; 3(7):272-279. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01333-9. View