» Articles » PMID: 33807860

The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33807860
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Urban environments are inhabited by several types of feline populations, which we can differentiate as feral cats, free-roaming pets, and confined pets. Due to a shift in the cultural representation of cats from pest controllers to companion animals, cats living semi-independently of humans are perceived increasingly negatively, while the pet population has become the object of intense care. A regulative approach converges with a concern for welfare in the operation and educational campaigns of municipal shelters, which through their implementation of neutering policies have proven to be key players in the contemporary relation of urban cats and humans. The generally widespread notion of cat welfare associated with a secure life comes into tension with the fact that the psychobiological needs of feral cats are significantly different than those of pets. It becomes apparent that individual interactions between humans and cats in urban environments in the Anthropocene are increasingly influenced by the intervention of institutions that can be characterized as seeking to administer the wild.

Citing Articles

Attitudes towards urban stray cats and managing their population in India: a pilot study.

Changrani-Rastogi A, Thakur N Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1274243.

PMID: 37964912 PMC: 10641441. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1274243.


You Are Welcome! A Media Analysis of Risk Factors, Prevalence and Management of Free-Roaming Dogs in Iran.

Amiraslani F Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(14).

PMID: 37508123 PMC: 10376389. DOI: 10.3390/ani13142347.


Coexistence between Humans and 'Misunderstood' Domestic Cats in the Anthropocene: Exploring Behavioural Plasticity as a Gatekeeper of Evolution.

Natoli E, Litchfield C, Pontier D Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(13).

PMID: 35804616 PMC: 9264925. DOI: 10.3390/ani12131717.

References
1.
Slater M, Garrison L, Miller K, Weiss E, Drain N, Makolinski K . Physical and Behavioral Measures that Predict Cats' Socialization in an Animal Shelter Environment during a Three Day Period. Animals (Basel). 2015; 3(4):1215-28. PMC: 4494369. DOI: 10.3390/ani3041215. View

2.
Read J, Dickman C, Boardman W, Lepczyk C . Reply to Wolf et al.: Why Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat Management. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(9). PMC: 7552220. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091525. View

3.
Chu K, Anderson W, Rieser M . Population characteristics and neuter status of cats living in households in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009; 234(8):1023-30. DOI: 10.2460/javma.234.8.1023. View

4.
Finka L, Ellis S, Stavisky J . A critically appraised topic (CAT) to compare the effects of single and multi-cat housing on physiological and behavioural measures of stress in domestic cats in confined environments. BMC Vet Res. 2014; 10:73. PMC: 3998042. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-73. View

5.
Crawford H, Calver M, Fleming P . A Case of Letting the Cat out of The Bag-Why Trap-Neuter-Return Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat () Management. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(4). PMC: 6523511. DOI: 10.3390/ani9040171. View