» Articles » PMID: 33799032

The Prevalence of Psychiatric Comorbidities During the SARS and COVID-19 Epidemics: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Overview
Journal J Affect Disord
Date 2021 Apr 2
PMID 33799032
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) are associated with various psychiatric comorbidities. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in all subpopulations during the SARS and COVID-19 epidemics. A systematic literature search was conducted in major international (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Internet [CNKI] and Wanfang) databases to identify studies reporting prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in all subpopulations during the SARS and COVID-19 epidemics. Data analyses were conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0 (CMA V2.0). Eighty-two studies involving 96,100 participants were included. The overall prevalence of depressive symptoms (depression hereinafter), anxiety symptoms (anxiety hereinafter), stress, distress, insomnia symptoms, post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and poor mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic were 23.9% (95% CI: 18.4%-30.3%), 23.4% (95% CI: 19.9%-27.3%), 14.2% (95% CI: 8.4%-22.9%), 16.0% (95% CI: 8.4%-28.5%), 26.5% (95% CI: 19.1%-35.5%), 24.9% (95% CI: 11.0%-46.8%), and 19.9% (95% CI: 11.7%-31.9%), respectively. Prevalence of poor mental health was higher in general populations than in health professionals (29.0% vs. 11.6%; Q=10.99, p=0.001). The prevalence of depression, anxiety, PTSS and poor mental health were similar between SARS and COVID-19 epidemics (all p values>0.05). Psychiatric comorbidities were common in different subpopulations during both the SARS and COVID-19 epidemics. Considering the negative impact of psychiatric comorbidities on health and wellbeing, timely screening and appropriate interventions for psychiatric comorbidities should be conducted for subpopulations affected by such serious epidemics.

Citing Articles

An umbrella review of the prevalence of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: Call to action for post-COVID-19 at the global level.

Mohseni M, Azami-Aghdash S, Bashzar S, Mousavi Isfahani H, Parnian E, Amini-Rarani M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3562.

PMID: 39716132 PMC: 11664853. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21085-5.


Estimation of the prevalence of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses.

Amini-Rarani M, Azami-Aghdash S, Mousavi Isfahani H, Mohseni M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2831.

PMID: 39407138 PMC: 11476206. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19729-7.


Pre-Pandemic Predictivity of Anxious-Depressive Symptoms in Post-Surgical Traumatic Distress in Hysterectomy for Benign Disease and COVID-19 Outbreak: A Case-Control Study.

Ielmini M, Casarin J, Callegari C, Bellini A, Favata M, Giudici A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892859 PMC: 11172625. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113148.


Stress, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance among healthcare professional during the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review of 72 meta-analyses.

Al Maqbali M, Alsayed A, Hughes C, Hacker E, Dickens G PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302597.

PMID: 38722888 PMC: 11081353. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302597.


Drug-Drug Interactions Between COVID-19 Treatments and Psychotropic Medications: An Updated Study.

Boppana U, Leonard T, Jolayemi A, Ansari M, Salib A Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e50469.

PMID: 38222143 PMC: 10786447. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50469.


References
1.
Riley S, Fraser C, Donnelly C, Ghani A, Abu-Raddad L, Hedley A . Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science. 2003; 300(5627):1961-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1086478. View

2.
Grant M, Geoghegan L, Arbyn M, Mohammed Z, McGuinness L, Clarke E . The prevalence of symptoms in 24,410 adults infected by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 148 studies from 9 countries. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234765. PMC: 7310678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234765. View

3.
T S Lee D, Sahota D, Leung T, Yip A, Lee F, Chung T . Psychological responses of pregnant women to an infectious outbreak: a case-control study of the 2003 SARS outbreak in Hong Kong. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 61(5):707-13. PMC: 7094779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.08.005. View

4.
Ko C, Yen C, Yen J, Yang M . Psychosocial impact among the public of the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Taiwan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006; 60(4):397-403. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01522.x. View

5.
Chan A, Huak C . Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond). 2004; 54(3):190-6. PMC: 7107861. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqh027. View